Results 1 to 6 of 6

Thread: Lenovo x220t specs

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Posts
    95

    Lenovo x220t specs

    This model released by the Lenovo is quite good and impressive but I think that the nine hour battery life should be there for the multitouch screen . I hope that there will be choice to use that without multitouch. This will be helpful for the users like me who are the pen-only user and want the extended battery life and improved screen quality. I am posting this here so that I can know that what the other people think about this. So please reply.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Posts
    3,107

    Re: Lenovo x220t specs

    I am actually interested regarding the screen. They list 12.5" but the present one is 12.1". I am thinking that what the extra .4" will going to hold. They as well listing it like an HD display, except 1280x800 is theoretically HD (can perform native 720p). Do you believe they would set out all the way to 1080p within a 12" screen? What may be the pixel compactness even be by means of that many pixels?

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Posts
    625

    Re: Lenovo x220t specs

    I was at first concerned that the 12.5" screen may signify N-trig as opposed to Wacom also, other than the pen within the picture obviously have an eraser, that I do not believe N-trig pens contain. I know Wacom does not at present contain digitizers on 12.5" but I think that if this may be their initial new size. But the battery life is quite good and it is the best thing that I found in this model.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Posts
    930

    Re: Lenovo x220t specs

    This will possibly become one of the biggest mistakes in the coming years ... Of course, I mean the fact that they are using a screen resolution of 1366x768, you are placing a damn 16:9 screen for a Tablet PC, which is quite difficult to use a 1280x800 through a 16:10 mode portrait. I do not know what they think they are serving, but the aspect ratio and resolution that makes the device much more x220t ineffectual as compared to X200t / x201t.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Posts
    725

    Re: Lenovo x220t specs

    If a 16:9 monitor and a monitor of 16:10 has the same diagonal, the screen will have a larger surface 16:10 and greater number of pixels. In other words, a 24 "16:09 monitor is actually smaller than a 24" 16:10. This makes them cheaper to manufacture. What the manufacturers were able to reduce the costs of the monitors while competing directly against the most expensive 16:10 because they still could advertise the same size

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Posts
    3,620

    Re: Lenovo x220t specs

    This seems a immense machine for me. I had been seriously considering an HP 2740p, but it seems worth the wait. Much more powerful CPU and IGP, more storage options (2.5 "and 1.8 instead of MPCI") port of a computer screen instead of the docking station, better battery life w / o battery laminar the HP w / cut, IPS multitouch screen as standard, although at a base price, and the list goes on. Certainly not the best Lenovo keyboard to boot!

Similar Threads

  1. Lenovo Thinkpad X220T turning of randomly
    By mukala in forum Portable Devices
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 10-04-2012, 07:28 AM
  2. Need help for upgrading Lenovo ThinkPad x220t ram
    By Ooghavanth in forum Portable Devices
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 27-10-2011, 10:30 PM
  3. Have anyone purchased Lenovo 42962WU ThinkPad X220T?
    By sushantbankar in forum Portable Devices
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 10-08-2011, 08:31 PM
  4. Lenovo x220t pen now working well on edges of screen
    By Keshini in forum Portable Devices
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 26-07-2011, 07:13 PM
  5. Lenovo X220t vs. Asus EEE Slate EP121
    By jAYASENA in forum Portable Devices
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 24-06-2011, 10:11 AM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Page generated in 1,714,141,207.53893 seconds with 17 queries