Results 1 to 2 of 2

Thread: Sony Ericsson Vivaz Pro vs. Nokia C6

  1. #1
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Posts
    1

    Exclamation Sony Ericsson Vivaz Pro vs. Nokia C6

    Hi guys,
    I am confused whether to buy Sony Vivaz Pro or Nokia C6 due to the following points:-
    Resolution- Sony(340*620) and Nokia (340*120)
    Nokia Has USB-on-th-go (which i cant miss out on) and sony records 720p videos....help meee!!!

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Posts
    2,091

    Re: Sony Ericsson Vivaz Pro vs. Nokia C6

    I would go for Sony Ericsson Vivaz Pro because of its following features:

    Screen
    - 360x640 pixel
    - 16,777,216 colour 16:9 nHD touchscreen (TFT)
    Memory
    - microSD (supported to 32GB)
    - Phone memory up to 70MB
    Actual free memory may vary due to phone pre-configuration.
    Networks

    - UMTS/HSPA 900/2100
    - GSM/GPRS/EDGE 850/900/1800/1900
    - UMTS/HSPA 850/1900/2100
    Available colours
    - White - Black
    Sizes
    - 109.0 x 52.0 x 15.0 mm
    - 4.3 x 2.0 x 0.6 inches
    Weight
    - 117.0 gr
    - 4.1 oz
    Symbian Series 60, 5th edition
    720 MHz, PowerVR SGX graphics
    Gesture control, Google maps, Facebook and Twitter apps, YouTube and Picasa integration.

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 13
    Last Post: 28-10-2010, 11:12 PM
  2. VPN-Client for Sony Ericsson Vivaz Pro
    By Revati in forum Portable Devices
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 07-10-2010, 10:23 PM
  3. Sony Ericsson Xperia X10 vs Vivaz
    By Lalitmohan in forum Portable Devices
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 07-05-2010, 10:30 PM
  4. Sony Ericsson Vivaz or Satio
    By Captain Carrot in forum Portable Devices
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 06-05-2010, 10:34 AM
  5. Want to buy Sony Ericsson Vivaz pro
    By Valliy in forum Portable Devices
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 26-02-2010, 11:52 AM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Page generated in 1,714,114,247.82708 seconds with 17 queries