Results 1 to 5 of 5

Thread: Mac OSX: Do you think that red, yellow and green button will be smaller

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Posts
    19

    Mac OSX: Do you think that red, yellow and green button will be smaller

    I don’t know it possibly be presently for Apples stuff however if you look at the present iTunes the buttons are smaller furthermore in the Mac App Store their regarding the similar size. I cannot inform from other images however if they are I am going to be a little disappointed, they just do not look as nice. What do you think about it let me know.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    2,180

    Re: Mac OSX: Do you think that red, yellow and green button will be smaller

    I like the buttons in a vertical position at what time Mac OS X was introduced and spoke knobs Jobs has been explained as similar to a traffic light seems much more natural for them to have the lights are aimed. In terms of size, because they are not getting any smaller, I always managed to click easily, so no big deal. Definitely Mac OS X could see Lion take the style of the little iTunes button. On the other hand, I believe that the vertical design is the exception not the rule.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    2,442

    Re: Mac OSX: Do you think that red, yellow and green button will be smaller

    I will go with touch interface icons, as well as certainly the essential equipment upgrades necessary to accommodate such functionality. Although the role I would like nothing more than to the active desktop to QuickTime. I have in reality required to watch movies as well as programs similar to my wallpaper. It is very well for the 27 "iMac does not need that function, by means of real estate, however if I am on my MacBook by means of a 19 "screen I would desire to have wallpaper on the external screen responsible for video as well as still be capable to move the application screens and forth between the MacBook.I am certain this is not a complicated task re-enter the code.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    3,971

    Re: Mac OSX: Do you think that red, yellow and green button will be smaller

    Active Desktop for Windows has been one of the most horrible abominations. I am pretty sure you be able to still obtain to play QuickTime apps on Mac OS X.I believe the buttons will in reality get more for the reason that the touch is certainly coming to OS X at several point and someway in the coming years. Mac OS X will not touch. No one desires to move his arms in front of your iMac. Steve Jobs has said on more than a few occasions. At best, I saw them come by means of a "hybrid" MacBook Air, together the display to form a shape factor IPAD, as well as the release of iOS.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Posts
    4,586

    Re: Mac OSX: Do you think that red, yellow and green button will be smaller

    The standard system applications generally have the extensive top bar previously. As a result Mail and iCal and Address Book and Safari and iChat as well as Preferences can all follow iTunes lead. Further non system applications be supposed to well have a choice or else used to differentiate between applications which have full screen modes as well as those which do not. So for instance All application will go full screen however the developer may possibly opt out but would have to make use of the vertical lights.

Similar Threads

  1. How Do I Make a PDF Smaller...?
    By Rafaeel in forum Windows Software
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 10-12-2009, 04:48 PM
  2. Problem of screen showing green, yellow and red colors
    By Abdullah30 in forum Monitor & Video Cards
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 22-10-2009, 12:01 AM
  3. ps3 the power light comes on and flashes red, yellow then green
    By Ashton5 in forum Hardware Peripherals
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 18-05-2009, 01:34 PM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Page generated in 1,711,723,833.53764 seconds with 17 queries