Results 1 to 5 of 5

Thread: Nokia 5230 XpressMusic vs Samsung CorbyTXT

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Posts
    37

    Nokia 5230 XpressMusic vs Samsung CorbyTXT

    I am planning to buy a new mobile phone. I have two choices to go for, one is Nokia 5230 XpressMusic and the other one is Samsung CorbyTXT. Actually both the mobile phones are good at their places. But I want to know all the features related to Nokia 5230 XpressMusic and Samsung CorbyTXT. May be this will help me to take the correct decision. If possible please mention the approximate price of this mobile phone.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Posts
    267

    Re: Nokia 5230 XpressMusic is better than Samsung CorbyTXT

    Well I will suggest you to go for Nokia 5230 XpressMusic, because I like the phone personally some of the related features of this phone are: Nokia 5230 XpressMusic has a display resolution of 360 x 640 and it has Thin Film Transistor (TFT) display. This phone comprises of Lithium-Ion battery which has 420 minutes of talktime support and 432 hours of standby support. It has in built memory of 70 mb and comes with the extendable memory of 16 giga bytes.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Posts
    421

    Re: Samsung CorbyTXT is a good option

    According to me Samsung CorbyTXT is a better mobile phone compared to Nokia 5230 XpressMusic. The feature which, I like about Samsung CorbyTXT is that it comes with QWERT keyboard. This type of keyboard enhances the experience of sending sms to friends. It is very easy to type sms on qwert keyboard rather than type the sms on the normal mobile phone keys. Well the support for the color display is less that is 256 k and the screen resolution is 1476x144. This phone also runs with the support of Lithim Ion battery which supports 450 minutes of talk time mode and 390 hours of standby mode. I am suggesting this mobile phone because I am using this mobile phone.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Posts
    401

    Re: Nokia 5230 XpressMusic has more features

    If we compare the price of these two mobile phones Nokia 5230 XpressMusic has a high price compared to Samsung CorbyTXT. But with a little high price Nokia 5230 XpressMusic is giving a lot of features which are not available in Samsung CorbyTXT. Samsung CorbyTXT does not have support for the following features which are available in Nokia 5230 XpressMusic: WiFi, Email Client, Instant messaging, Dual band, 3G connectivity, GPS, Flight Mode and many more. So if you want all these features enable in your mobile phone than it is better to go for Nokia 5230 XpressMusic.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Posts
    346

    Re: Nokia 5230 XpressMusic vs Samsung CorbyTXT

    The approximate price of Nokia 5230 XpressMusic is around Rs 9,500 and the approximate price of Samsung CorbyTXT is around 8000. So there is a clear difference of Rs 1500. But according to me the features and the application you are getting in Nokia 5230 XpressMusic are more than Samsung CorbyTXT. I will suggest you to buy Nokia 5230 XpressMusic mobile phone because come with great packages. Just for saving a small amount of money it will not be better to buy a mobile phone with fewer features. Your choice may also depend on your budget. I have given you the approximate price of both the mobile phone, so it depends upon user, which mobile phone is better.

Similar Threads

  1. Nokia 5530 Xpressmusic vs. Samsung s5560
    By Jimuta in forum Portable Devices
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 06-02-2011, 07:49 PM
  2. Nokia 5230 Vs Samsung S5230
    By Prashobh Mallu in forum Portable Devices
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 18-06-2010, 04:54 AM
  3. Confused between Samsung S5600 and Nokia 5230
    By Valliy in forum Portable Devices
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 05-03-2010, 10:08 PM
  4. Replies: 1
    Last Post: 01-04-2009, 06:56 PM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Page generated in 1,714,129,705.22198 seconds with 16 queries