Results 1 to 4 of 4

Thread: Need a "basic" laptop for "normal" users

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Posts
    69

    Need a "basic" laptop for "normal" users

    My Dell (already 2 years) has died and so I am here in need of something new.

    I explain the "basic" and "normal" from the title is that I am neither pro nor gamer or the photoshopper, just office and the Internet. In short for my little sister and family. Small budget, small needs, it should be quite simple but I'm just dropped on the editions of Vista.

    I found below models online:
    Toshiba L300-1BG
    Fujitsu-Pi 3525-014
    Lenovo 3000 N500

    Do you have other references in the same genre?

  2. #2
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    4,041

    Re: Need a "basic" laptop for "normal" users

    I would say go for Lenovo or HP laptop. And for processor Intel Core2 Duo because it is best for non gamers.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Posts
    69

    Re: Need a "basic" laptop for "normal" users

    Thank you, but I had already made the main points to watch (1 GB of RAM, Core2 Duo, Vista Premium instead of Basic) from which I shortlisted 3 models (see initial post). Add a bag if necessary, a mouse and a numeric keypad.

    I don't want HP because my friends says that its after sales service is worst.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    82

    Re: Need a "basic" laptop for "normal" users

    Why don't you go for some of the models listed below:
    Acer Aspire 2920 Laptop
    Sony T7100
    Dell Inspiron 1525

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 3
    Last Post: 10-01-2014, 10:40 AM
  2. Replies: 6
    Last Post: 18-05-2010, 12:27 AM
  3. Replies: 3
    Last Post: 25-06-2009, 03:49 AM
  4. Replies: 2
    Last Post: 29-08-2008, 06:47 AM
  5. Replies: 1
    Last Post: 06-11-2007, 02:18 PM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Page generated in 1,710,834,627.74050 seconds with 16 queries