Are these Vcore values for Q6600 correct?

[Jacob]

Do not know if I have excellent Vcore values, as for the cabinet and would like to know if any better configuration.

I have a Q6600 G0 processor overclocked to 3.2 GHz. I got the fsb to 356 and the multiplier x9.

Temperatures are good and they give me idle at about 30 degrees, now it's 28º 28º 26º 28º. At full load 51º higher.

The Vcore varies as when enabled the power-saving options when I lower the multiplier to 6x the Vcore is up to 9x when 1.120v stays at 1.260v max.

I've seen the Q6600 as specified by the Vcore is 1.35 and I am shocked that my values are so low in order. I imagine that the 1.35 would be the maximum value that guarantee.

Are the values that are given proper or I would have to change for optimal functioning?

[lorenz]

Thats Good.

Man it is stable and perhaps I will say, although I would always do manual voltage overclocks, but in this case you do not get 1.26V in full load, is well and good temperatures.

However you could try manually have what makes you such minimum Vcore 3.2GHz stable and you may be worthwhile.

[Jacob]

Ok, then the values are good, stable enough and I will in any case would further lower the Vcore.

Although I doubt one has emerged, changing the Vcore only when this exchange value to 9x, is independent of the power-saving options or not? It may also lower the voltage of the Vcore when in saving energy? and if lower the Vcore and maximum margin stable thing left I guess is not very high, right? Strange if it could lose 1.2 V. In this case is there any benefits as regards to temperatures? Is there any disadvantage for having the low Vcore?

A greeting and thanks.