Vista System Optimization Mistakes

[Muwafaq]

For Vista this hardware consumes king, I believe we have heard already is. Therefore, many so-called Vista optimized Cheats. Is actually taught us how to Vista "slimming." With Vista attention, continues to heat up, more and more media will also be these skills onto the magazine, and by doing so, some "packaging", the many of my friends even more that it should be regarded as a "classic." However, in these so-called optimization Cheats in part is misleading in nature. If we blindly the words of blind obedience and unthinking, it may be the operating system itself is disruptive, thereby affecting our normal use. Hence I want to know common misunderstanding Vista optimization.

[Devasis]

If you are frequent use Vista users, then you must have witnessed the powerful hardware that Vista support. It is no exaggeration to say that, if not anything special ahead of, or special unpopular hardware, access to Vista, the operating system can be automatically recognized, and rarely require users to manually install the driver. In fact, the results obtained with the Vista that the huge size of nearly 1.3 GB drive library, are inseparable. Thus, in some "Cheats", they have a "if you have installed the necessary hardware, they can make on the rest assured that the removal of it, can save 1.3 GB of space out of it."
The truth is really true? In fact, the problem lies in the phrase "has been installed, the necessary hardware". In fact, although a lot of the hardware will be allotted the driver CD-ROM, but for such a simple dish like the U of hardware, we are still difficult to find a matching driver. If you really have to delete this folder, then when a new U disk inserted into the system, not just Vista not recognize. Even, even if the installation of the so-called "universal driver.” will also be of no avail. Therefore, this folder, if you do not have much understanding of Vista, or not to move better.

[Solomon]

With regard to Prefetch (pre-reading), I believe we are already very familiar with. In the XP era, it is a landmark feature. Through the automatically record programs that run each one, XP will be able to next time you start the program, through the Prefetch to speed up its start-up speed. However, this technology also has drawbacks. That means that, with time, growth in the use of computers, Prefetch folder contents will be more and more. This will not only occupy a lot of disk space, but also lead to XP search pre-read data slower. Therefore, many articles have suggested that this folder should be emptied regularly.
However, in Vista, on a regular basis empty SuperPrefetch are not desirable. Because, and XP's Prefetch comparison, Vista's SuperPrefetch undoubtedly more intelligent. In addition to automatically run the program outside the memory of each one, it will also automatically start the data analysis. Then, based on the results, the system is idle, the user may later be used in advance of the program is read into memory, to more effectively speed up the proceedings. Therefore, once we SuperPrefetch empty, then these hard statistics out to start the law also be eliminated. Therefore, the best way, or leave it. If it is NTFS partition is entirely in the right properties, the compression option to hook it on. If you close superfetch, then you delete it no problem.

[MrChris-]

Remove WinSxS \ backup it does not matter
Although, in XP and Vista systems, there is a WinSxS folder (Windows Side-by-Side), but both the volume, but quite different. In general, for a newly installed XP system is good, WinSxS folder, also about 20 MB. And then on Vista, it will be a sudden leap to the size of 3.3 GB.
Therefore, more and more friends started to WinSxS folder, expand the research. The final "research results" that "can delete WinSxS \ Backup of the file."
Indeed, while the volume of different, but the role of both the operating system in WinSxS, but exactly the same. Store different versions of the system components, as a place, WinSxS includes a number of important documents the system. In fact, for such documents, our best approach is not to delete. Because, even if a file is lost, there is a particular module may cause the operating system cannot run, thereby affecting our normal use. The WinSxS \ Backup files in the same, if forcibly removed. When you go to install the latest version of the system patches, I am afraid we will encounter trouble.

[Calvin K]

Forcibly specify the size of virtual memory
From the XP era that online has been in circulation with such a technique. That is the virtual memory, the maximum and minimum, set the same. In this way, we can guarantee will not produce excessive amounts of disk pieces. In fact, such an approach is not desirable. Because, when we will be the maximum and minimum virtual memory, set very large. If you happen to read a small-capacity data files, then we should spend more time on the computer virtual memory retrieval. Or, when we will be the maximum and minimum virtual memory located very hour. Once the data exceeds the capacity of the initial page file, it will produce memory overflow error. None of this is in memory, consuming a very serious Vista system, are obvious.
Therefore, the best way was able to separate the virtual memory, set aside a partition. Then, respectively, the minimum value of the virtual memory set to 1.5 times the physical memory, the maximum set to 3 times the physical memory.

[Lillebror]

Cancellation System Sleep
In the Vista system, the sleep function is activated by default. However, due to its size and physical memory, the same. Therefore, from a practical point of view, it occupied disk space cannot be belittled. Thus, many optimization Cheats hibernation file system will be abolished, made of an option will do. In fact, if you are a laptop user, Vista was a powerful sleep function and sleep function, not only allow you to forget the shutdown command. Moreover, because it can significantly reduce the workload of the disk, notebooks will become more energy-efficient. In contrast, in this hard disk is cabbage price era, blindly cancel this feature, indeed undesirable.