Results 1 to 6 of 6

Thread: Different method of creating raid partition

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Posts
    44

    Different method of creating raid partition

    Raid is nice way to backup and cheaper also. The thing which I am trying to figure out is that what are the different ways of creating a raid partition. Does this really work well. I had planned for the same for my server backup. What are the advantages provided by it and how can I improve my performance of data backup in it.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    3,388

    Re: Different method of creating raid partition

    The RAID 1 presents an easy and effectual explanation obviously. In the occasion of a disk stoppage, the RAID organizer will basically utilize the mirror drive for information recovery and carry on or maintain operation. OK, you will necessitate substituting the defunct drive to reinstate the previous level of resiliency, but you will not have misplaced several of your vital user information.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    4,085

    Re: Different method of creating raid partition

    There is a numeral of RAID "levels", every focusing on one or additional of these benefits, moreover singly or in amalgamation. The two most important methods used are striping, and mirroring. Striping is the method to make available increased presentation. It is a method of mapping information across the corporeal drives in an arrangement to generate a huge virtual drive. The information is subdivided into successive sections or "stripes" that are written consecutively across the drives in the collection.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Posts
    3,267

    Re: Different method of creating raid partition

    Mirroring was the primary actual accomplishment of RAID, characteristically requiring two individual drives of comparable capability. One drive is the active drive and the less important drive is the parallel, and the method presents an easy form of redundancy for information by mechanically writing information to the emulate drive when it is written to the active drive.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Posts
    3,522

    Re: Different method of creating raid partition

    For numerous years RAID was the conserve of enterprise, server-based systems. On the other hand, in current years, with numerous desktop motherboards coming prepared with on-board RAID controllers, the technology has stimulated to the mainstream, where it is being gradually more deployed together for reasons of extracting the greatest level of presentation from a system and as a suitable explanation to the problem of information sanctuary.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Posts
    3,295

    Re: Different method of creating raid partition

    Here, you are implementing RAID 1 for the reason of enhanced resiliency. Hard disk head crashes might be comparatively exceptional in this day and age, but they can tranquil be a devastation when they happen. It depend upon the several people regularly backup their user information. Certainly, with the magnitude of hard disks these days, it might be sensible to introduce a conservative information backup regime, to tape or detachable disk media.

Similar Threads

  1. Method to setup Kingston HyperX 3k's in raid
    By Muralidhar in forum Official Kingston Forum
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 28-06-2014, 01:43 PM
  2. Replies: 5
    Last Post: 12-01-2011, 10:13 AM
  3. Problem Creating RAID 1
    By Andrea000 in forum Hardware Peripherals
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 30-06-2010, 11:32 AM
  4. Creating partition of database tables
    By LaMarcus in forum Software Development
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 30-01-2010, 11:48 AM
  5. Ubuntu's Guided Partition Method
    By Lillebror in forum Operating Systems
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 31-01-2009, 03:42 PM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Page generated in 1,714,235,332.29332 seconds with 17 queries