I thought that we in this thread could discuss for-and, of course, disadvantages.
Vista in general is quite high demands on performance, but have it so it is definitely worth it.
I thought that we in this thread could discuss for-and, of course, disadvantages.
Vista in general is quite high demands on performance, but have it so it is definitely worth it.
I have Vista X64, has 4G frame so it floats on good, however there are things that are not compatible with 64bits, especially not Vista 64bits.
The only problem I had was that my Ipod Nano was not eager to be found in the x64. The IOF drove me crazy but it dropped when I took it just was not possible.
Otherwise, it is cruel to me. Run is on a fairly powerful machine and can not speak about what it is in a worse
In general, I am now satisfied any time with Vista. At least since I switched from Vista 64-bit to 32. Although I have a powerful computer, it was a relatively large number of important programs that lacked compatibility when I used 64.
I like it. It seems to me that those who evict from the complaint based on hearsay should test themselves and thus make their own impression. Vista is also aesthetically pleasing.
Has unfortunately not running x64 but x32 bit on a laptop works great, has been a little skeptical about vista before, but now it has become amendment to it, really nice and all that I need the functions.
Have had vista x64 but thought it sucked. Though it can depend on that I actually do not like windows OS at all. But the only reason I use them for is for games. And then it's xp applicable. As also is probably the last good OS of windows ever. If not now when windows 7 change more or less everything. But it does not look like it.
I run ubuntu and I know that you can use programs such as wine. But it never works as well. So I have 2 OS on the computer. It's ubuntu and XP.
Bookmarks