Go Back   TechArena Community > Technology > Networking & Security
Become a Member!
Forgot your username/password?
Register Tags Active Topics RSS Search Mark Forums Read

Sponsored Links



Cisco ASA5520 vs Juniper SSG 320M vs Juniper SSG 350M.

Networking & Security


Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
  #1  
Old 09-05-2011
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 8
Cisco ASA5520 vs Juniper SSG 320M vs Juniper SSG 350M.
  

Hello guys i need some suggestions from you, i am working as an assistant manager in IT company and i am not from the computer background so i donít know much about the technical stuffs. And deciding new firewall for branch is given to me there will be around 10 web servers will be used, i have searched over the internet and i found three useful firewalls Cisco ASA5520, Juniper SSG 320M and Juniper SSG 350M and ineed your help to decide best one out of these three.

Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 09-05-2011
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 1,107
Re: Cisco ASA5520 vs Juniper SSG 320M vs Juniper SSG 350M.

I donít know much about the Cisco ASA5520 but i can give some point between the SSG 320M and 350M, as only from the name itís clear that 350M much more functionality than the 320M but you can select it according to your requirements. Firewall performance for large packets and IMIX2 in 320M is 450+Mbps and 400Mbps and thatís for 350M is 550+Mbps and 500Mbps. Maximum number of users supported is unrestricted in both the cases. 320m have 3 Physical interface module (PIM) slots where as 350M has 5 slots. LAN and WAN interface options are same.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 09-05-2011
Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 945
Re: Cisco ASA5520 vs Juniper SSG 320M vs Juniper SSG 350M.

Well what i like most about the 350M is it has 128,000 maximum concurrent sessions which only 64,000 in the 320M. AES256+SHA-1 VPN and 3DES+SHA-1 VPN performance is 175Mbps in 320M where as in the 350M its 225Mbps for both. And New sessions/second rate in the 320M is 10,000 but in the 350M its 12,500. And Firewall packets/ second rate in the 320M is 175,000 but itís 225,00PPS in the 350M.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 09-05-2011
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 1,117
Re: Cisco ASA5520 vs Juniper SSG 320M vs Juniper SSG 350M.

Thanks a lot guys for reverting so quickly, i had posted this query on other forums site also but i got replies only on few them and those replies are not consists of so much detailed description of the product. Well guys you have given me the detail description about the Juniper SSG 320M vs Juniper SSG 350M but there is nothing about Cisco ASA5520, guys can give some detailed description of Cisco ASA5520 so then i will be able to decide.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 09-05-2011
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 1,178
Re: Cisco ASA5520 vs Juniper SSG 320M vs Juniper SSG 350M.

Hereís full specification of Cisco ASA5520, hope with help of this you will be able to decide the best one out of these three. Firewall throughput in Cisco ASA5520 is upto 450Mbps. and VPN throughput is up to 225Mbps. concurrent sessions is 280,000 more than the above two. Interfaces are 4 Gigabit Ethernet ports and 1 Fast Ethernet port, and security contexts is upto 20. and Virtual interfaces (VLANs) are 150 in Cisco ASA5520.
Reply With Quote
Reply

  TechArena Community > Technology > Networking & Security
Tags: , , , , , , , ,



Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search


Similar Threads for: "Cisco ASA5520 vs Juniper SSG 320M vs Juniper SSG 350M."
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
iPAD and Juniper SSL VPN Taizin Portable Devices 2 01-10-2010 10:32 AM
Juniper Visa became Barclay on an online apple store Doumbia Portable Devices 6 29-05-2010 11:22 AM
Juniper NetScreen not working in windows 7 Bearer Windows Software 4 07-02-2010 04:44 AM
Cisco's IOS vs Juniper's JUNOS austin26 Networking & Security 3 26-10-2009 02:48 PM
Can't Connect to Juniper Network Connect 5.4.0 Ulupy Vista Help 1 01-05-2008 02:59 PM


All times are GMT +5.5. The time now is 02:47 AM.