Need some information on MSE plus Malwarebytes

[Gechina]

I was under the notion that the MSE was enough defenses and must never run more than one program; however, I just read this. Microsoft Security Essentials is more enhanced than Norton. Norton is most terrible one obtainable, and Microsoft Security Essentials is most excellent. I advise dumping Norton. Here's my standard advice on the subject:

For anti-virus program, I advise NOD32, if you're ready to pay for it. If you wish for a free antivirus, I advise to make use of Avira, Avast and Microsoft Security Essentials. In addition you require anti-spyware software. I advise that you download and install Malware Bytes Antimalware together freeware and Super Antispyware.

[Amie]

In my occurrence of Norton's 2009 and latest products are very superior. I'm running the free version of Comcast Norton Security Suite on my computer and works well. I do not approximating Norton pre-2009 products, which in my familiarity; it could deliberate a computer down. I suspect that someone who says a big NO to all Norton products has not treated their loved recently. MSE is also very good, and it's free. Malwarebytes' Anti-Malware works well with antivirus programs, whenever you get the free version, which has no real-time protection. There is the possibility of bad interactions with virus protection programs if MBAMs real time is enabled. Install the free version, then update and analysis from time to time.

[HiSpeed]

Malwarebytes' Anti-Malware works well with antivirus programs, whenever you get the free version, which has no real-time protection. There is the possibility of bad interactions with virus protection programs if mbam real time is enabled. Install the free version, then update and analysis from time to time. "That is absolute BS. You can run any program in real time against spyware with an A / V and the program will not conflict. Implementation of Antivirus programs in the same time is another story.

[BiGMaCHiNe]

Personally I installed MBAM with most anti-virus software, including MSEs, hundreds of times and never had any kind of conflict. However, if one experiences conflict, adding exceptions and / or delay the implementation of one or the other must be the answer. If some users have knowledge troubles running MBAM complete and MSE the difficulty is exclusive to MSE. Personally, I observe and understand why somebody would select EMS as your anti-virus anyway when so many other free anti-virus are much better. The only exception to this is when you have very limited resources. At the moment it is the case with both scanners in real time would not create additional logic anyway with or without the conflicts in question.

[Connect_Me]

Most of all the technicians I know use and recommend a layered approach to keep a computer free of malware. This includes real-time anti-virus software, as well as real-time MBAM. As the malware bytes, it is the way to the end that will or will not cause conflicts. Because MBAM, and the majority added non-malware antivirus scanners do not work the same way as anti-virus software for both can be used simultaneously with the two that has real time protection.

[Wguy2008]

It was agreed that during the installation of the MSE, the advice is made not to include two anti-virus real time securities and two spyware with real-time protection. Uninstall existing antivirus and spyware before installing Microsoft Security Essentials If you make use of additional than individual antivirus or antispyware series, at the equivalent occasion, the computer possibly will experience decreased performance, it becomes unstable, or restart unexpectedly. Earlier than you install Microsoft Security Essentials, you have to disable or uninstall extra security-related programs. This advice is restricted of MSEs is, the problem is with the MSE.