ZoneAlarm Pro 2010 is not working

[LynDa55]

I have taken the plunge as well as installed the newest Zonealarm Pro 2010 to Co-exist by means of Avast pro 5. Unexpectedly there is no wait at boot-up as per earlier edition of ZONEALARM, which to me is a HUGE! And Apart from the temporary pop-ups as well as containing to permit access to some programs ZONEALARM pro 2010 appear to be living more cozily alongside Avast! Than what Outpost Pro 7 executed. There is numerous good reviews perched about, regarding this edition so for now, except everything untoward occur I will be it installed.

[Amie]

I attempted it for an only some days. It looks quite stable. Now had one warning. while I was utilizing IE8 plus was downloading a big avi file from Megaupload in one tag as well as browsing in one more I make sure the Task Manager plus Zonealarm was utilizing regarding 60% CPU as well as building the scrolling choppy in the web page I was analysis. While I shut down ZONEALARM, the difficulty went away. So try this out.

[HiSpeed]

I have not attempted the PRO, however after a long time I attempted the new free publish as well as browsing was very speedy. I was stunned. Quicker than Win7 firewall control+Win Firewall that I generally utilize. No BSODs also. However, CPU tradition while downloading from FTP, was regularly 4-6% of my CPU while this was at completes frequency .as well, to my astonishment, by lowering the safety to medium; Emule was in fact having the ports properly open. For somebody with router, this could effort. It is modern success, as ZONEALARM has disregarded the pledges of emule user .So, such a shame for the CPU. I now not able to allow seeing 6% for 3 download threads. Possibly be one day they will lower the CPU procedure as well as I will utilize it.

[BiGMaCHiNe]

I have observed this with java based sites. Possibly be worth contributing into the subsequently beta round. possibly be for a moment next year to point out to the developers the problem Does it have an effect on your system speed as well as stability like in the case of no way? Or it is something that you do not like to have anyway? Attempt to perform the similar analysis but with a naked configuration (MSCONFIG to take away any third party software. There could be a variance with something running though 4-6% sounds quite low anyway).

[Paisley007]

It does not have an effect on stability, I only like background procedure to be as light as achievable as they run the entire time, and I’d rather have my video encoder find a 4% boost more willingly than having ZONEALARM taking it. I attempted uninstalling Avast, except the behavior does not adjust. I do not run lots of things at startup, so the simply other opportunity is a few hardware drivers. Anyway, 4-6% may appear quite low, but while other firewalls be able to control the similar job with 0-1%, it look a misuse to me. What I like regarding ZONEALARM free is that it has easy interface. No HIPS no also many frills, does not reduce speed sometimes. With OA as well as even more Comodo I am able to sense a slowdown though browsing explorer windows. Even Outpost eats a bit less than ZONEALARM. as well as it has HIPS as well. So if ZONEALARMF eats more CPU than firewalls among HIPS, after that i’d say it lacks effectiveness. I did not even observe how much ZONEALARM eats with p2p, but if it wants 4-6% for 3 FTP connections, I surprise what will occur with 100 connections.