Results 1 to 2 of 2

Thread: Dual core Vs Dual Processor

  1. #1
    rockaway Guest

    ThumbsUp Dual core Vs Dual Processor

    A major question for some people getting ready to buy a high-end system is whether they

    want or need to have two processors available to them. For anyone doing video editing,

    multi-threaded applications, or a lot of multitasking the answer is a very clear 'yes'.

    Then the question becomes whether two separate processors (as in a dual Xeon or Opteron

    system) is the way to go, or whether a single dual core processor (like a Pentium D or

    Athlon64 X2) will do just as well. Dual CPU vs dual core -- which is better?!

    Intel did not increase the speed of their front-side-bus (the connection between the CPU

    and the motherboard) when they switched to dual-core, meaning that though the processing

    power doubled, the amount of bandwidth for each core did not. This puts a bit of a

    strain on the Intel design, and likely prevents it from being as powerful as it could

    be. To counteract this effect, Intel continues to use faster system memory to keep

    information supplied to the processor cores. As a side note, the highest-end Intel chip,

    the Pentium Extreme Edition 955, has a higher front-side-bus speed, as well as having a

    larger (2MB per core) cache memory and the ability to use Hyperthreading (which all

    non-Extreme Edition Pentium D processors lack). This makes it a very tempting choice for

    those wanting to overcome some of the design handicaps of Intel's dual-core solution.

    AMD, on the other hand, does not use a front-side-bus in the traditional sense. They use

    a technology called HyperTransport to communicate with the chipset and system memory,

    and they have also moved the memory controller from the chipset to the CPU. By having

    the memory controller directly on the processor, AMD has given their platform a large

    advantage, especially with the move to dual-core. The latest generation of AMD

    single-core processors can use single- or dual-channel PC3200 memory, but it is

    interesting to note that even though dual-channel operation doubles the memory speed, it

    does not double the actual memory performance for single-core processors. It appears

    that dual-channel memory just provides significanly more bandwidth than a single

    processor core can use. However, with dual-core processors all that extra bandwidth can

    be put to good use, allowing the same technology already present in single-core chips to

    remain unchanged without causing the same sort of bottleneck Intel suffers from.

  2. #2
    wwwpcrepairie Guest
    Pentium D isn't a dual core design.

Similar Threads

  1. Advise for changing from Dual Core processor to Quad Core processor
    By Non-$ensoi in forum Overclocking & Computer Modification
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 25-03-2012, 04:09 PM
  2. Replies: 4
    Last Post: 15-02-2011, 07:40 AM
  3. Replies: 4
    Last Post: 22-01-2011, 06:22 PM
  4. Which dual core processor is better AMD 64 X2 6000 or Intel Core 2 Duo E6700
    By hatodishu in forum Motherboard Processor & RAM
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 29-12-2010, 06:06 AM
  5. Intel Celeron Processor 900 vs. AMD Athlon II dual-core processor M320
    By Farhat007 in forum Motherboard Processor & RAM
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 25-09-2010, 09:24 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts