Results 1 to 11 of 11

Thread: Intel Core 2 Duo E8400 vs. Intel Core 2 Quad Q9300

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Posts
    56

    Intel Core 2 Duo E8400 vs. Intel Core 2 Quad Q9300

    I am going to assemble a new computer but I am confused between these two processors: Intel Core 2 Duo E8400 and Intel Core 2 Quad Q9300. Can somebody suggest me that which one is the best between them? If you have any suggestion/information regarding this then please let me know that. I will be thankful to all the replies for this.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Posts
    388

    Re: Intel Core 2 Duo E8400 vs. Intel Core 2 Quad Q9300

    I would like to tell you that the Intel Core 2 Duo E8400 is in the toplists in the price search engines of the 3-GHz dual-core and currently holds a top position.

    Intel's fastest dual-core processors are from the 8000-series family of Core 2 Duo. In the advanced 45-nanometer process produced a double-core work with a higher front side bus (333 instead of 266 MHz) and are 50 percent more L2 cache (6 instead of 4 MB) more than the 65-nanometer in previous generation E6000.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Posts
    473

    Re: Intel Core 2 Duo E8400 vs. Intel Core 2 Quad Q9300

    Intel Core 2 Quad Q9300 is using 45-nanometer manufacturing process, this processor can achieve not only lower power consumption than equivalent versions built with technology to 65 nanometers, but a complement to your internal support for SSE4 instructions. This is particularly useful in multimedia processing because of their ability to reduce clock frequency, the processing time significantly.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Posts
    415

    Re: Intel Core 2 Duo E8400 vs. Intel Core 2 Quad Q9300

    With the power-save mode, the required for the system with Intel Core 2 Duo E8400 at idle is somewhat stronger as compared to the clocked Intel Core 2 Duo E8500 and this is only 133 watts.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Posts
    470

    Re: Intel Core 2 Duo E8400 vs. Intel Core 2 Quad Q9300

    There is something more important as compared to the energy consumption and that is the test platform. We determine the energy efficiency of computing performance under Cinebench 10 for full utilization of all cores is divided by the gross electricity consumption of the test platform. Here, the Core 2 Duo E8400 is average with 40.0 points, slightly worse than the E8500 (42.3 points per watt), but worked at least slightly more efficient than the E8600, which reached only 39.3 points per watt.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Posts
    350

    Re: Intel Core 2 Duo E8400 vs. Intel Core 2 Quad Q9300

    The Intel Core 2 Quad Q9300 is the best quad-core Intel CPU with 6 MB L2 cache. Of the 45-nanometer process processor made is for the widely used 775-slot, and is therefore particularly suitable for upgrading PCs. In contrast to the current quad-core Core i5 and i7 series, the Core 2 Quad Q9300 is missing the third level cache. It also supports the 2.5 GHz CPU but is not the current SSE4 instruction set, but only the version 4.1.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Posts
    379

    Re: Intel Core 2 Duo E8400 vs. Intel Core 2 Quad Q9300

    The Core 2 Duo E8400 has access to plenty of buffer memory. Each core has 32 KB L1 cache. This is in addition to the 6 MB shared L2 cache. The functional leaves nothing to be desired: The 3-GHz processor supports hardware virtualization, Intel Virtualization Technology (IVT) and allowed use of 32 - and 64-bit operating systems via EM64T. This is also having the security feature Trusted Execution Techology (TXT). Other features include the thermal protection Thermal Monitor 2 and the energy saving feature Enhanced Intel SpeedStep Technology (EIST), including the timing and voltage regulation Enhanced Halt State (C1E).

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Posts
    608

    Re: Intel Core 2 Duo E8400 vs. Intel Core 2 Quad Q9300

    The process of transferring music and videos to other file formats and compression levels makes the Core 2 Duo E8400 looks good. This becomes more important if you use software such as iTunes, which utilize more than two cores. On the other hand, it works frequently with applications that are optimized for quad cores or simultaneously with many programs.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Posts
    449

    Re: Intel Core 2 Duo E8400 vs. Intel Core 2 Quad Q9300

    I am using the Intel Core 2 Duo E8400 and I don’t think that this is not perfect in any manner. I have never faced any problem with this. I have never used the other one but for E8400, I am sure that it will not disappoint you.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Posts
    334

    Re: Intel Core 2 Duo E8400 vs. Intel Core 2 Quad Q9300

    Here is short description of Intel Core 2 Quad Q9300
    • Mark : Intel
    • Type: Intel Core 2 Quad
    • Format: Socket 775
    • Number of cores: Quad Core
    • Operating frequency: 2.5 GHz Quad Core
    • L1 cache: 4 x 32 KB
    • L2 cache: 2 x 3 MB

  11. #11
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Posts
    208

    Re: Intel Core 2 Duo E8400 vs. Intel Core 2 Quad Q9300

    I think that the Intel Core 2 Quad Q9300 will be the best option for you. This is much quicker as compared to the Intel Core 2 Duo E8400. I am using the same and so I can tell you this for sure. So just go for the Intel Core 2 Quad Q9300.

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 5
    Last Post: 26-03-2012, 03:26 PM
  2. Replies: 6
    Last Post: 05-09-2011, 10:41 PM
  3. Intel Core 2 Duo E8600 vs. Intel Core 2 Quad Q9650
    By K88 in forum Motherboard Processor & RAM
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 24-04-2009, 11:41 AM
  4. Intel Quad Q6600 (2.4GHz) vs. Core 2 Duo E8400 (3.0 GHz)
    By Sanith in forum Motherboard Processor & RAM
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 08-01-2009, 10:50 AM
  5. Ticking Sound in Intel Core 2 Quad Q9300
    By pragnesh in forum Motherboard Processor & RAM
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 27-12-2008, 10:59 PM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Page generated in 1,714,129,552.86420 seconds with 17 queries