Somewhat similar o the A6 performance at 17 watts (the TDP meant for CULV Sandy Bridge chips utilized in these things). Rather A8 otherwise better while the Bridge raises stakes next year. So far every AMD have that power resources is netbook E-series that is worse as compared to the portable Sandy Bridge in each way. Can they just not hit this objective even at a elevated price point? I recognize that the complete "ultrabook" thing is an Intel-funded project to reside relevant vs. ARM, except the right chips and there must be no motive for the OEMs that don't utilize the designs as well as knowledge they lift for official "ultrabook" models and suggest AMD versions which is more to GPU as compared to CPU.