Intel Core i7 and Phenom II is slower than Bulldozer

[Fitroy]

AMD reportedly gave out appearance figures in a presentation to its mates, display figures viewed by DonanimHaber. It is reported that a 8-core processor dependent upon the "Bulldozer" high-performance CPU building design is channeled by its producers to have 50% higher display than existing processors for example the Core i7 950 (4 core, 8 strings), and Phenom II X6 1100T (6 hearts). Practically nothing is had prior experience with the processor, combining at what clock speed the processor was running at, substantially less what alternate segments were driving the test machine.

[Alexisus]

Taking this data into record, the declared Bulldozer based processor ought to synthetically even outflank Core i7 980X six-heart, Intel's quickest desktop processor in the business sector. Advanced from ground, the Bulldozer building design centers on more excellent entomb-center correspondence and reconfigured ALU/FPU to actualize higher guidelines for every ticker cycle (IPC) contrasted with the past cycle K10.5, on which its present Phenom II arrangement processors are based. The processor is upheld by newfangled 9-arrangement heart intelligence, and a unique AM3+ socket. AMD is looked for to uncover this stage a small later for the present year.

[Nutty]

As specified above, but not yet test consequences are point by point in Hardware News AMD's official documentation of appearance we were fit to get. In this archive, AMD Bulldozer 8-core processor (model name and clock speed appearance fragment, but that data has not been specified), 6-heart Phenom and Core i7 950 and considers II X6 1100T. The assessed effects in the report, processors, a few contrasting classes (media, rendering and diversion) in considering the for the most part appraisal of the Bulldozer processor 8-core Core i7 950 is 50% speedier focused. Precisely examined the appearance table in the 8-center processor, AMD's Bulldozer brings on an improvement, specifically amusement and rendering tests.

[Terrextre]

Well, JF once stated they anticipate 50% more throughputs for interleague contrasted with MC 12core. Now talk is BD 8core is 50% quicker than Thuban x6 1100T. Notwithstanding it appears to me to be an off base elucidation of past known data. (Comment 33% more centers for 50% more display). Bulldozer-based private news about late-cycle AMD processors will keep on.

[AmdUser]

AMD's since a long time ago-envisioned cutting edge processor clan is no longer the final bow in the Bulldozer to be dropped in. Improvement work in advancement in light of the fact that 2005, a revamped microchip structural planning, code-named Bulldozer, AMD is indicating in the interest of the association's history as the most obviously essential transaction. Phenom II processor house, the first organize anticipated to be utilized to reinstate the models with the AMD structural engineering, expand piece of the overall industry by offering forward moving keys to the most elevated-appearance section and intends to furnish explanations to unexpected portions of administration contestant. Listen Read phonetically Rate interpretation

[Logan.M]

They actually need to send the stuff snappy. AMD had shining plans the whole time, but the time is what has driven them over each time. Notwithstanding Intel was "sitting" in it. I mean what great is it to have 50% preferable appearance now when you suck on the real equipment discharge day. So good fortunes to AMD and i trust they'll get the stuff out in time. We should not begin the particular memory misfortune. We know how this goes. The aforementioned things are invariably handpicked numbers from quite particular cases, if not absolutely occupied from some display "recreation". Give a pure chip to a regretful Asian handyman and possibly we'll see something to work toward getting excited about.

[Balamohan]

I bet a hexa-core Sandy Bridge will win the Bulldozer octo-core, not to mention management issues 50%. At least it is a significant improvement Phenom II. The only thing that AMD certainly has going for it is not a drastic change in basins such as Intel, once again, made a habit of doing. Hopefully it will be a worthy upgrade from my i5 750, I want some new hardware to play.