Intel Core i7-2600K graphics performance

[Izna]

I have been looking for the proper results of Intel 2600k's graphical performance, except the entire thing I discover are reviews utilizing real graphics cards within the systems up alongside additional CPUs. There is small doubt, if I am using a stock 2600k with onboard graphics, what material graphics card model might you declare it is essentially as dominant as? I am currently using 2600k and I didn’t do any kind of graphical tests over this at present. I wonder how performance of games could over this CPU if I built a computer without any video cards.

[Avikshit Sinha]

Given the large difference in performance Core i7 2600K a graphics card for gamers clearly not redundant. However, the glass is half full, not half empty: Intel has with its latest generation is managed to design gaming at all with some decent settings possible. However: at playable frame rates to get you in most games the resolution and / or significantly reduce the effects. Gaming with the HD 3000 Graphics of the Core i7 i5 2500K 2600K and a good choice if you have no budget for a video card and you have some time to overcome. Are you a non-demanding gamer, then you can use the HD 3000 Graphics to work fine, but you'll certainly limitations to starting.

[Mariah-Simpson]

I understand that gaming is the topic here, but knowing all those (young) gamers what the price of all that extra power is. Once we played a game for the game now you feel more annoyed at the lack of graphics. I do not play many games and definitely not that demanding. I'm curious what the HD3000 in performance in other purposes.

[Radames]

The integrated graphics chip will be able to save a lot of electricity, because the actual graphics card will only be switched at high-end games have. Thus the ondi-GPU DirectX 10.1, compatibility with HDMI 1.4, and stereoscopic 3D video that can be delivered in Blu-ray quality. On the performance side, the new 2600K real thrust of it with the Intel Core i7-980X stands on a step, however, to one-third of the cost. OverClocking first tests have shown a stable overclock at 4.6 GHz, which gives the CPU a big lead over the AMD competition.

[AzzamKhan]

One claims that the Intel Graphics HD 3000 GPU-in within the Sandy Bridge processor is fast enough for an acceptable way to play modern games. However without graphics card there is nothing to say because you can get the better performance with the CPU but to get better quality you should find a perfect GPU.

[Galbraith]

Compared with the previous range of Intel processors do the Sandy Bridge processors is about twice as good. This is also the majority said, because really adequate frame rates, we unfortunately do not appear. The averages for an integrated GPU not bad, but given the relatively low resolution when we ran the benchmarks, the GPU for most people who occasionally want to play a game is not the best option. A Sandy Bridge CPU can be perfectly applied in a Media Center system with no additional graphics card, partly because there's support for 3DTV