Results 1 to 6 of 6

Thread: Core i7 900 Series compatibility for TV-d

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Posts
    54

    Core i7 900 Series compatibility for TV-d

    Is Intel VT-d Visualization Technology sustained or maintained on this motherboard. I read a number of pages and I originate out by means of the intention of X58 chipsets be supposed to sustain or maintain this characteristic. The VT-d Pass-Through is a technique to provide a domU exclusive to have right of entry to a PCI function utilizing the IOMMU provided by VT-d. It is first and foremost targeted at HVM (completely virtualized) guests for the reason by means of the intention of PV (par virtualized) go through does not necessitate VT-d (although it might be utilized too). I need some information about the above topic.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    1,260

    Re: Core i7 900 Series compatibility for TV-d

    The VT-d is an additional virtualization tech. It depends on chipset and BIOS sustain or maintain. It permits to virtualized supplementary peripherals such as Graphic Cards, Network cards, Sound cards. etc The recent past I was running by means of MSI P55 MB and when I rationalized BIOS to v1.6 the VT-d alternative come into view in CPU Settings. You be able to set together VT techs there. The VT-x and VT-d additional than in my BIOS there is immediately alternative for "Intel Virtualization technology"(I presume by means of the intention of it stands merely for VT-x). So I am interested if my MB sustains or maintains it too. I anticipate by means of the intention of it does cos VT-d is extremely helpful technology (completely virtualized) guests for the reason by means of the intention of PV (par virtualized).

  3. #3
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    1,295

    Re: Core i7 900 Series compatibility for TV-d

    I had currently built an innovative Core i7 desktop to happily utilize by means of VMware Workstation 6.5. Are there several drawbacks to facilitate Turbo Mode and VT-d. I would similar to save power additional than not at the luxurious of the non-functioning fundamental apparatus. In addition, the ASUS P6T Deluxe motherboard has "ASUS EPU" which I have made it disable anybody here by means of experience utilizing EPU with VW65. I am presently curios and would similar to a number of input commencing from the community on this one. Most of them are busy budgeting for a couple of innovative servers and I consideration it would be superior to endeavor out the Core i7 CPU's, additional than observe the majority of them do not present VT-d, but just VT-x.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Posts
    866

    Re: Core i7 900 Series compatibility for TV-d

    The Core i7 is a desktop CPU, not a server CPU. I extremely suggest you to give the impression of being at the Xeon 34xx series as an alternative. Intel core i7 does for illustration not sustain or maintain ECC memory. The submission you mentioned would be additional secure by means of ECC memory to prevent data corruption. Convinced, additional than encompass you seen how many people present Corei7 servers. Just for the reason by means of the intention of it's aimed at the desktop market does not mean it would not perform well in a server surroundings. So why would not this be a superior performing CPU in the similar server setup (i.e. identical chassis, motherboard, RAM etc.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    976

    Re: Core i7 900 Series compatibility for TV-d

    For the reason that you be supposed to compare the Core i7 930 by means of the Intel Xeon X3460 (4x 2.80 GHz / 8 MB Cache) in addition, the Core i7 does not sustain or maintain ECC memory. In a mission critical setting, this is a serious handicap to articulate the smallest amount. At the same time as the i7 determine to execute well for non mission critical submission, I would recommend server grade hardware (CPU, Main board, Chassis, Memory and HDD) for mission dangerous surroundings The X3460 supports additional memory, supports ECC and has a advanced turbo occurrence then the equivalent core i7 The X3460 in addition hold up 1333 Mhz memory (the core i7 in its similar class, does not). The Xeon 3460 sustain or maintain Intel Trusted Execution Technology at the same time as the equivalent i7 does not.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Posts
    1,003

    Re: Core i7 900 Series compatibility for TV-d

    I have even evaluate the 2 entry level CPU's in equally classes. I do not observe several mention of TV-d hold up on these XEON CPU's although. The ECC hold up, I have comprised not got one of these yet, additional than attractive much the entire in excess of the place (in terms of suppliers) where I give the impression of being there was no talk regarding by means of the intention of the Core i7 would not work by means of ECC. So moreover the sales reps pull a polluted move in creating you believe you be able to get ECC, or are immediately misinformed. It sustains or maintains Core i3, i5 and i7 as well as Xeon X34xx CPUs and it has onboard IPMI by means of KVM/IP and remote media functions. You determine to feel affection for the KVM/IP function.

Similar Threads

  1. Intel Core 2 Duo T series vs P series
    By Delgado in forum Motherboard Processor & RAM
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 22-01-2011, 02:51 AM
  2. Intel core 2 duo compatibility with Medion 8800
    By Murena in forum Motherboard Processor & RAM
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 14-05-2009, 07:25 PM
  3. Core 2 Quad compatibility with windows xp
    By N I C K in forum Motherboard Processor & RAM
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 18-03-2009, 10:13 AM
  4. Compatibility DDR3/Core i7 920
    By bobmitch in forum Motherboard Processor & RAM
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 24-11-2008, 11:47 AM
  5. Compatibility of new Core 2 Duo?
    By Zoe in forum Motherboard Processor & RAM
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 15-11-2008, 02:33 PM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Page generated in 1,711,674,010.09475 seconds with 17 queries