Intel core i5 760 vs. New Intel core i5 2500 sandy bridge

[brynhildur]

I am looking for buy or configure a computer for my personal use at my home. I have note down good specification. But when I came to the selection of processor I stuck between them. My choice is Intel processor. And in that Intel core i5 760 or Intel core i5 2500(sandy bridge). What do you think about it? I heard that both are of same price. But I don’t have idea about the performance. So I am asking you which one is best for my computer. I have chosen the specification that really suits for both of this processor. But I don’t know which one I should continue for. Can you help me out?

[Avikshit Sinha]

Intel is predictable to proclaim the discharge of the Sandy Bridge processors in the CES 2011 and it is elevated time to analysis a few of these approaching processor. The component figure of the Sandy Bridge based processor has in progress of appearing. It appears approximating Intel is departing to remain its i3, i5 and i7 categorization that it used for the former Nehalem supported processors. Till we obtain various genuine performance statistics, presently hang around for the actual item to get underway.

[AzzamKhan]

Each and every one of the Intel Sandy Bridge core i5 processors, except the Core i5-2390T has 6 MB of L3 Cache. Observe that the 6 MB of the L3 cache is mutual among the graphics controller in the Sandy Bridge processors. This thing hasn’t launched yet. So I think now you should go for i5 760 if you are in a urgent position. As we look from the Performance-wise, the i5-760 was an amazingly assorted bag. It charged fine alongside it’s the majority intimately priced AMD contestant, the Phenom II X4 970 Black Edition. At stock speeds for example the i5-760 dragged out a front of 140 tips in Media Benchmarks, in spite of operating 700MHz slower than the AMD chip.

[Mariah-Simpson]

The Core i5-760 doesn't fluctuate to a great extent from its forerunner Core i5-750. Indeed, we preserve only distinguish a little expansion in clock rate. It is upper by 133 MHz, so the fresh model has a defaulting clock rate of 2.8 GHz. If not, it is the similar quad-core Lynnfield which do not fit in with the Core i7 family unit merely for the reason that it be deficient in Hyper-Threading technology. When I looked into the specifications of Core i5 2500K sandy bridge processor I found that It is foundation on 32nm process and LGA1155 interface, the defaulting core frequency is 3.33GHz (4 core). The disappointing thing is that it does not support Hyper-Threading technology. It contain 6MB shared L3 cache and this processor do not padlock the multiplier.

[Christina 80]

I consider a lot of populace are questioning whether they are mislaid the huge values they spot on i5 760s etc, which are all outstanding CPUs and are at present the attend CPUs of option on some boards. So people kind of anxious that if they remain for SandyBridge, they'll give up this vast covenant on a completely satisfactory chip, and then they agonize that on one occasion SandyBridge comes away, it will be further luxurious for trivial grows, etc, then they'll hope they bound on the verified technology of 760.