Results 1 to 5 of 5

Thread: Compare Intel Core 2 Quad Q8200 and AMD Phenom X4 9550/9500

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Posts
    562

    Compare Intel Core 2 Quad Q8200 and AMD Phenom X4 9550/9500

    I am planning to buy a desktop personal computer for me. But I have no idea about this hardware stuff. So for buying the desktop I have the two choices to choose from. Whether to choose the desktop with the Intel Core 2 Quad Q8200 processor or to choose the desktop with the AMD Phenom X4 9550/9500 processor. If anybody can suggest me which is the better processor to go for I will be very thankful. In simple words I need to know the comparison between the Intel Core 2 Quad Q8200 processor and AMD Phenom X4 9550/9500 processor.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    816

    Re: Intel Core 2 Quad Q8200 is the best processor

    I will suggest you to go for the desktop computer system with the Intel Core 2 Quad Q8200 processor. Intel is the most trusted company. This Intel Core 2 Quad Q8200 processor comes at the price of $169.99 if you buy this Intel Core 2 Quad Q8200 processor online which is the best price you can get. Intel Core 2 Quad Q8200 processor operates at 2.33 Giga hertz with the 1333 Mega hertz front side bus. Four megabytes of L2 cache. This Intel Core 2 Quad Q8200 processor comes with the thermal design power with the rating of 95 W.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    835

    Re: Compare Intel Core 2 Quad Q8200 and AMD Phenom X4 9550/9500

    Intel is good but the Intel processor has no comparison with the AMD processor. AMD Phenom X4 9550/9500 processor comes at the price $209. The price of AMD Phenom X4 9550/9500 processor is high compare to the Intel Core 2 Quad Q8200 processor but the features provided by this AMD Phenom X4 9550/9500 processor. The processor is provided with the 2.2 Giga hertz. The thermal design power with the rating of 95W.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Posts
    562

    Re: Compare Intel Core 2 Quad Q8200 and AMD Phenom X4 9550/9500

    Thank for the reply but I am not interested in the technical knowledge of the Intel Core 2 Quad Q8200 processor or the AMD Phenom X4 9550/9500 processor. I need to know that which is the better processor for me. I am not a hardware engineer and I have not understood a single word of the technical reply. I want to know the difference between the two processor in simple words.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    698

    Re: Compare Intel Core 2 Quad Q8200 and AMD Phenom X4 9550/9500

    Basically if you are planning to buy the personal computer for playing the latest games, then AMD Phenom X4 9550/9500 processor is the best choice for you. But if you are planning to buy the personal computer for other related stuffs or for the programming purpose or using the latest software, then the Intel Core 2 Quad Q8200 processor. In short you can go for the Intel Core 2 Quad Q8200 processor which can be used for both the purpose whether you want to play the game or you want to work with the latest software.

Similar Threads

  1. compare Intel Core i3-2120 VS AMD Phenom II X2 565?
    By Mahalingam in forum Motherboard Processor & RAM
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 12-07-2011, 11:57 PM
  2. AMD Phenom 9550 Quad Core Temperature control
    By Gania in forum Motherboard Processor & RAM
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 25-01-2011, 03:45 AM
  3. System testing for Intel Core 2 Quad Q8200 and Q9550
    By Fanishwar in forum Motherboard Processor & RAM
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 31-10-2010, 05:39 AM
  4. Intel Core 2 Quad Q9550 or AMD Phenom X4 II 940 BE?
    By Gluteus in forum Motherboard Processor & RAM
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 05-03-2009, 11:17 PM
  5. Intel Core 2 Quad Q8200 too hot
    By Volodymyra in forum Motherboard Processor & RAM
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 23-01-2009, 10:45 PM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Page generated in 1,711,613,096.23861 seconds with 16 queries