Q9300 vs.Q6600 vs.E8500

[Gluteus]

Hello

I have seen this in xbitslabs, and I got confused that which one is good, so guys what do you think ...


http://72.14.235.104/translate_c?hl=...WY6QaVztXbmJjg

[SergioSantos]

Hi,

I think only tests benchmark is being valued much the quantity of Cores, but then in actual testing programs, games, the E8500 is the decompression melts.

[Barclay]

Hi,

Nothing New Here. The q9300 a little better than the Q6600 but more expensive.

The Q9300 between 15% and 20% worse in games that E8500, Render 40% better, and in other applications in most Q9300 a little better, except that one must use only 2 kernels.

The E8500 would never my choice for the price. Before lame or E8200 or E8400 and the ocean. Or a Quad ocean if I want to spend more.
In analyzing what the E8500 climb to 4.3 GHz stable.

I begin to think that the Q6600 uploaded to a range of 3,2-3,6 GHz remains the best value for money (as in both Duos Quad) even having left the new 45nm.