Results 1 to 6 of 6

Thread: GeForce GTX 560 Ti 2gb SLI vs single GeForce GTX 580 with BF3

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Posts
    58

    GeForce GTX 560 Ti 2gb SLI vs single GeForce GTX 580 with BF3

    Currently I am having the single GeForce GTX 580 and while playing the BF3, ?I am not getting the performance as I am expecting from it and so I am thinking to upgrade the system. Now I am thinking to get the GeForce GTX 560 Ti 2gb SLI but I am unsure that if this will boost the performance. So I thought that it will be better for me if I can take some suggestion from you people for this. If someone of you have some experience with the game using the GeForce GTX 560 Ti 2gb SLI then please post your experience over here.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Posts
    368

    Re: GeForce GTX 560 Ti 2gb SLI vs single GeForce GTX 580 with BF3

    I will not recommend you to go for that as there is going to be availability of the new faster cards in few months. If you really want to get the value for the money then you must wait for some time and get the best that are about to come. don’t go for that cards that are poorly coded and can give you poor fps. This is the only thing that I can tell you and I hope that this will be helpful to you.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Posts
    409

    Re: GeForce GTX 560 Ti 2gb SLI vs single GeForce GTX 580 with BF3

    Yes, I also think that you must wait for some time and if you wish to increase your performance then you can try by decreasing the settings a bit and after that play the game. Lowering the settings can raise the performance for you.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Posts
    58

    Re: GeForce GTX 560 Ti 2gb SLI vs single GeForce GTX 580 with BF3

    Quote Originally Posted by Oms-waroop View Post
    Yes, I also think that you must wait for some time and if you wish to increase your performance then you can try by decreasing the settings a bit and after that play the game. Lowering the settings can raise the performance for you.
    I have already tried with that and that is giving me the same performance as this was giving with the increased settings. I can hardly see any changes to this. So I think that changing the card will be the only option for time to get this problem resolved. GeForce GTX 560 Ti 2gb SLI was looking only one option for me but I am not getting any reply from someone having experience with this.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Posts
    359

    Re: GeForce GTX 560 Ti 2gb SLI vs single GeForce GTX 580 with BF3

    One of my friends was playing the beta/demo and I told him to use the settings that I am using as he was also facing somewhat similar problem. So What I am having is, disabled the aa and also I have disabled the motion blur and all the other settings at 1680x1050. Me and my friend is getting 70fps and that is good for me to play the game. You can also try with the same settings and see if that is helpful for you or not.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Posts
    415

    Re: GeForce GTX 560 Ti 2gb SLI vs single GeForce GTX 580 with BF3

    GeForce GTX 560 Ti 2gb SLI is surely going to give you better performance as compared to the single GeForce GTX 580. I am also using the same and this is the best for the games. I don’t have experience with the GeForce GTX 580 but with the GeForce GTX 560 Ti, I am very sure.

Similar Threads

  1. Single NVIDIA GeForce 580 vs. two 9800gt cards in SLI
    By B-P-ti in forum Monitor & Video Cards
    Replies: 11
    Last Post: 08-12-2011, 07:12 AM
  2. Replies: 10
    Last Post: 27-09-2011, 01:13 PM
  3. GeForce GTX 295 on a single PCB arriving by mid-May
    By shilong in forum Monitor & Video Cards
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 30-04-2009, 02:25 PM
  4. Replies: 3
    Last Post: 25-12-2008, 05:10 PM
  5. Replies: 1
    Last Post: 05-04-2007, 06:26 PM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Page generated in 1,715,131,122.65498 seconds with 17 queries