Best 2560x1600 primarily for gaming

**FFCookie** · 01-09-2010

Any graphics card is not equipped to display 2560 x 1600. First , even if only to display as many pixels via DVI standard ,i must be use a card with a DVI Dual Link type . Indeed, in standard DVI is limited to 1920 x 1200 , and it must link two 165 MHz TMDS signals in order to manage the 2560 x 1600 . This applies to all GeForce 7 / Radeon X1x00 middle and high end. Can anybody know that the Best 2560x1600 primarily for gaming. Please suggest. Thanks in advance.

**Marthaz** · 01-09-2010

In addition you can view this resolution , the next offer in games a good frame rate per second in this configuration . The 2560 x 1600 demand more than double the graphics power of a 1600 x 1200 ! So, it will have a very high -end card , that is to say at the moment a GeForce 8800 GTX . Worse , if you want to enable extra effects such as anti aliasing on games the most greedy , a second in SLI therefore will not be too much. Once past these obstacles , when you play in full resolution ... you will be amazed ! Total immersion guaranteed ! If you have the proper devices , keyboard, mouse quickly, possibly pad, joystick and steering wheel , it's better than a games room.

**ApPy10** · 01-09-2010

graphs containing several resolutions is not easy to read. Then because you are not interested in all tests in 2560x1600 or 1280x1024 . Everything depends on the screen that you have and the resolution it can support . Depending on your needs or desires, you can not see that parts of this test by being rid of resolutions that are unnecessary for you . ATI continues to hurt NVIDIA with aggressive pricing that require "green "to perform rapid price declines .

**Team Leader** · 01-09-2010

The price difference is very simple : it is not TN but VA or IPS. So it is useless to compare the price of a TN 27 " at the cost of IPS or VA 30 " then , manufacturers have not renewed their range in ages and use very expensive slabs ( slabs unlike last generation in c -PVA or e - IPS ). The fact that the manufacturer does not offer 2560x1600 in the lower diagonal is very simple: the pitch is already on a tiny 30 ". Then yes , it has greater difficulties for a model of diagonal and lower resolution (for example , more pixels , therefore more likely to have dead pixels ... what the shoves a little sore for a product high-end ...)

**Archibald** · 01-09-2010

You can buy Dell UltraSharp 3008WFP Monitor thats is a widescreen 30- inch offers unparalleled image quality for a resolution up to 2560 x 1600. This monitor is the first to offer DisplayPort connectivity , a technology standard that can display high definition images on your computer . Equipped with a powerful video processor , monitor 3008WFP offers video processing capabilities in resolutions up to 2560 x 1600 ( DVI graphics card with dual -link) . It also supports interlacing , noise reduction and other features associated video . With TrueColor technology ( color gamut of 117% ) and a contrast ratio of 3000:1.

**Birdie** · 01-09-2010

The 22-inch screens are now in the middle ranges . These are the screens 23-28 inches which dominate the market. From 23 inches, the resolution is:
- 1980 x 1200 (16/10 ) preferred to read on screen
- 1980 x 1080 ( 16 / 9 ) : cheaper . In the HD video format
The connection can be VGA ( analog , but still exceeded useful ), DVI ( digital ) and HDMI (transmits sound and video as SCART ) Show DisplayPort . Some are TV screens at the same time . We will give preference to a compatible display HDCP.