GTX 260 216 @ 1080P-Big drop in fps from 1680X1050

[Winnebago]

Will I become aware of a big drop in fps going up to this declaration. Thinking I am going to necessitate a GTX 285. It almost certainly would not be to enormous in crysis at full the whole thing wither filters at x2. It is able to barely run that at 1280X1024 for me. I bet several additional games similar to call of duty it would be alright. If your board is sli, perhaps think regarding getting a second one if you actually necessitate the presentation boost. I am individually thinking of it for the reason that I desire to get a 1920X1200 screen.

[Bindusar]

Well, no necessity to improvement. You have to work faultless and lost hardly several fps. Only game you noticed a bit was Crysis but that is to be predictable. The Crysis ran superior for you on 1080p than at 1650 (no aa while) no you would not. You are playing with 1680x1050 as well, shooter games merely, everything set on high, no fps drop at the entire. You are looking forward to add an additional for sli through.

[Chandranath]

With the whole thing maxed, 1920x1200, 4xAA, you do get regarding 38+ fps. And that is extremely well, by most standards, you would imagine. But it is true that you familiarity a number of severe frame rate drops (down to 11 or 12, sometimes). In the most demanding stages (everybody knows these stages), even a 5850 staggers along at 10 fps for 20 or 30 seconds at a time. For a moderately high-end card, that is unsatisfactory. I have taken to playing at 1440x900 in windowed mode, for the reason that you hate the blurriness that lower declarations generate on your monitor. So, you may say you play Crysis on a 1440x900 monitor with a 5850.

[CACTUS101]

I am using 2x22" LCD monitors which are 16x10 declarations. I have been using an 8800 GTX for moderately a number of at the same time as and presently I have moved to a HD 5870. If you desire to play games with highest particulars and bigger levels of AA without perturbing then generate the move. Even with my computer I find that a number of MMO's determine to still chug the computer, particularly when you work into areas with lots of players on screen.

[CAILYN]

As for Crysis, it is such an inadequately programmed game that it is deliberate on preponderance of computers; you cannot anticipate that game to give you 60fps similar to additional games on the maximum settings. You are almost certainly going to have to wait an additional generation or so, so that the hardware is so overkill to the point that even this inadequately completed game determines to topple 60fps at highest settings.

[xanix]

That is if you are fortunate adequate or sufficient to be playing a game that permits FOV changing. Dangerously, in this day and age, FOV be supposed to be a defaulting alternative in the majority games as an alternative of having to utilize hacks and console commands - which numerous games do not even have. As the OP, I am still torn on this problem. My 8800GT has been sent for RMA. I am using a 7900GT that I conventional for free. I originate that I have not actually gamed that much freshly and capacity be content to remain for Fermi's release. I do not intend on purchasing a Fermi card, merely to observe what it is and if ATI cards drop in price at that time due to increased opposition.