Results 1 to 4 of 4

Thread: Intel gma x4500hd VS Nvidia GeForce 8800 GTS

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    112

    Intel gma x4500hd VS Nvidia GeForce 8800 GTS

    I am confuse between this two graphics card nvidia 8800gts and intel gma x4500hd. Is intel gma x4500hd is better than nvidia 8800gts in performance and overclocking?

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Posts
    1,059

    Re: Intel gma x4500hd VS Nvidia GeForce 8800 GTS

    Intel gma x4500hd graphics card gives the 3D graphics performance you need for entertaining, with support for Microsoft DirectX 10, Nvidia GeForce 8800 GTS Delivers up to 2x the performance of a single GPU configuration.Intel GMA X4500HD also supports the highest levels of the Windows Vista experience.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    94

    Re: Intel gma x4500hd VS Nvidia GeForce 8800 GTS

    Nvidia GeForce 8800 GTS is first DirectX 10 GPU with full Shader Model 4.0 support delivers unparalleled levels of graphics realism and film-quality effects.An Intel 4500 is a cheap integrated graphics chip intended for everyday use(web surfing, etc.).

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    69

    Re: Intel gma x4500hd VS Nvidia GeForce 8800 GTS

    GeForce 8800 GTS Delivers a proven record of compatibility, reliability, and stability with the widest range of games and applications.The Intel GMA X4500HD isn't for Linux gamers, this is an ideal solution for solely desktop users.

Similar Threads

  1. Nvidia GeForce 8800 GTX dead
    By rihit in forum Monitor & Video Cards
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 09-12-2011, 07:38 AM
  2. Replies: 5
    Last Post: 30-07-2011, 07:49 AM
  3. PC does not start with Nvidia GeForce 8800 GTS
    By mikey32 in forum Monitor & Video Cards
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 05-01-2009, 08:13 PM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Page generated in 1,714,066,136.38496 seconds with 17 queries