Results 1 to 4 of 4

Thread: 8800 GTS 512 mb

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    106

    8800 GTS 512 mb

    Why does the 8800GTS 512mb sells more? I doubt that there is novelty to something. But is it the time to make a sli of 8800 GTS 512 mo?

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    27

    Re: 8800 GTS 512 mb

    It works very well . But a sli I do not know if it would be economically interesting.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Posts
    55

    Re: 8800 GTS 512 mb

    GTS specifications include a 90nm GPU with 96 stream processors, a 320-bit memory bus, core clock of 500 MHz, stream processor clock of 1.2 GHz and memory clock of 1.6 GHz. Initially this video card debuted with 640 MB of GDDR3 and later a 320 MB GDDR3 version was released with the exact GPU same specifications.

  4. #4
    Vadin Guest

    Re: 8800 GTS 512 mb

    The 8800GTS 512MB is always a good graphic card . It was replaced by the 9800GTX, which is the same. And do u SLI, that is not interesting. If it does not suit you, sells it and takes something else (and again, I am not convinced that this will be a good purchase, 8800 is far from being outdated.

Similar Threads

  1. 8800 GTX or 8800 512 GTS?
    By dalsandhu in forum Monitor & Video Cards
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 07-04-2009, 01:37 PM
  2. 8800 vs 8600
    By subinks.iway in forum Monitor & Video Cards
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 29-11-2008, 11:59 AM
  3. 8800 Gts
    By noscut in forum Overclocking & Computer Modification
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 01-09-2008, 06:43 PM
  4. Extra Fan for XFX 8800 GT
    By katsumoto in forum Hardware Peripherals
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 19-08-2008, 03:16 PM
  5. Nokia 8800 Arte and Nokia 8800 Arte Sapphire
    By Kooldinesh in forum Reviews
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 21-05-2008, 07:10 PM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Page generated in 1,714,993,631.73747 seconds with 17 queries