Results 1 to 7 of 7

Thread: Ati 4850 or 9800GTX+

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    339

    Ati 4850 or 9800GTX+

    Hello all,
    I would like to change pc. I found a lot of good things for various elements, but I still ask myself the question for this famous graphics card.I hesitate between 4850 and Ati 9800GTX +, all at Gainward I think. Could you enlighten me?
    The rest of the configuration:

    Internal Hard Drive Seagate Barracuda 3.5''7200.11 - 500 GB 32 MB
    Advance Housing PC Turboost
    Motherboard ASUS P5Q-PRO - (I hesitated with a gigabyte GA-EP45-DS3R)
    Intel Core 2 Duo E8500
    Logiciels Windows Vista Family Premium 32Bit Windows Vista Home Premium 32Bit
    Memory Kit of 2 bars CORSAIR DDR2 PC2-6400 - 2 x 1 GB (2 GB) 800 MHz - CASE 5 - TWIN2X2048-6400
    Food Corsair TX 650 Watts
    Thanks in advance for any help.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    1,467

    Re: Ati 4850 or 9800GTX+

    I am not sure that 4850 is better than the 9800 GTX +, it is better than the 9800GTX, certainly, but for the GTX +....against by if you take account of the 4850 Gainward (golden sample), I thought it was better, and that is what I read in a very comprehensive test is the best of 4850, 10 to 20 % Gain perfrence... approach it very often in 4870 (most of the time, there is rarely more than 6-7 fps diff between 4850 and 4870 GS and, in some cases, the 4850 GS, goes some tenth of the 4870 fps)
    then my (very) humble opinion, a 9800 GTX + 4850 is better than normal, but the 4850 golden sample and better than the 2 previous, for a price almost identical.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    339

    Re: Ati 4850 or 9800GTX+

    Of the total, between 780 and 810, according to the following sites and if the 9800GTX + or ATI 4850
    So I hesitate for each .... ati 4850 shows the past few months its best-quality, and the 9800GTX + is more recent ... to whether its value for money is worse drivers of a poorly defined?

    In any case thank you for your support

  4. #4
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    1,467

    Re: Ati 4850 or 9800GTX+

    Hard disk: ok
    Bottom: ok
    A pro asus p5Q only if you intend to make the crossfire, the Asus Otherwise p5Q big enough
    Processor: ok
    Operating system : ok
    Memory : g.skill prefer the pk
    Food: A corsair vx450w would largely the case with your config with a HD4850
    Graphics: The HD4850 Without hesitation Golden Sample This is the best HD4850:

  5. #5
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    1,149

    Re: Ati 4850 or 9800GTX+

    For food, do not aim so high. Takes rather a VX550, and highlights the difference in rams G. Skill in CAS4.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    339

    Re: Ati 4850 or 9800GTX+

    Thank you for your advice for the RAM.
    To map I think I have to look Gainward 4850 GS thus .

  7. #7
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    1,196

    Re: Ati 4850 or 9800GTX+

    The 4850 and more powerful than the 9800 GTX + if you want to have the same power as 4850 with 9800 it will need a 9800GTX "V2". It worth a normal 4850 or the 9800 GTX + is less efficient and 9800GTX ... "V2" more expensive than in 4850!

Similar Threads

  1. 9800GTX+ OC better then 9800GTX
    By SmokiN in forum Monitor & Video Cards
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 10-07-2009, 05:43 PM
  2. HD 4850 or 9800GTX
    By Diwakar_12 in forum Monitor & Video Cards
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 30-04-2009, 11:19 AM
  3. Sli between 9800gtx and gtx+
    By hatred in forum Monitor & Video Cards
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 28-02-2009, 08:45 AM
  4. 9800GTX vmod
    By RSeven in forum Overclocking & Computer Modification
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 02-02-2009, 09:00 PM
  5. Problems with 9800GTX +
    By Maximus() in forum Monitor & Video Cards
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 08-12-2008, 05:31 PM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Page generated in 1,713,534,762.88816 seconds with 17 queries