Results 1 to 4 of 4

Thread: 4870 Crossfire vs 4870x2

  1. #1
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    11

    4870 Crossfire vs 4870x2

    What is the most profitable?

    VS



    because the gain Crossfire is a little better than 4870x2
    Crossfire but a heater because only one

    3DMark Vantage


    What is your opinion?

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    52

    Re: 4870 Crossfire vs 4870x2

    the advantage of 4870x2 is that it takes only 2 slot and consumes less than a crossfire and a can over perf high resolution following a 2gb memory or perf level is the equivalent x2 has a crossfire.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Posts
    29

    Re: 4870 Crossfire vs 4870x2

    For consolidation, sit a test of X-bit labs proves the opposite of what cyberpunkfw1983 a hd4870 consumers see less than a hd4870x2.

    For the temperature and silence I believe that one hd4870x2 must do better than a hd4870 cf

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Posts
    92

    Re: 4870 Crossfire vs 4870x2

    The HD4870X2 has a potential of O / C relatively limited compared to the HD4870. So basically sit u put 2 HD4870 in crossfire, that thou O / C every 2 to catch, you atomised a HD4870 X2!

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 6
    Last Post: 26-09-2010, 12:11 AM
  2. 3870 crossfire vs 4870
    By Firon in forum Monitor & Video Cards
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 09-07-2009, 01:23 PM
  3. Crossfire HD 4870 choice
    By Bigga Lexx in forum Monitor & Video Cards
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 24-04-2009, 12:29 PM
  4. Crossfire 4870x2 + 4870 on Asus rampage II extreme
    By kyosang in forum Monitor & Video Cards
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 20-04-2009, 10:55 AM
  5. ATI 4878, 4870 or 4870X2 or 4890 Crossfire
    By MILINTICA in forum Monitor & Video Cards
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 03-04-2009, 07:33 PM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Page generated in 1,713,284,629.43120 seconds with 17 queries