Results 1 to 9 of 9

Thread: TATA Indicom Broadband is costly

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Posts
    50

    TATA Indicom Broadband is costly

    I saw TATA Indicom broadband tariff plan it's higher compare to other operator like TATA indicaom Unlimited 256 kbps plan Rs. 3,203 for 90 (Rs. 1068 per month )it's to high compare to other ISP. Hathway provide 256 kbps speed in Rs. 850 per month .

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Posts
    49

    Re: TATA Indicom Broadband is costly

    Reliance offering Unlimited 300 kbps speed at Rs. 800 per month.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Kolkata
    Posts
    60

    Re: TATA Indicom Broadband is costly

    Quote Originally Posted by ABHAYK View Post
    Reliance offering Unlimited 300 kbps speed at Rs. 800 per month.
    Give me the link please.....

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Posts
    1,476

    Re: TATA Indicom Broadband is costly

    Quote Originally Posted by ABHAYK View Post
    Reliance offering Unlimited 300 kbps speed at Rs. 800 per month.
    Infact I am getting a 256 kbps unlimited from hathway for a price of Rs. 730 per month, wonder how come reliance is offering in so low price 300 kbps unlimited? Whats the timeout of this plan. Could you please explain a bit more.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Kolkata
    Posts
    60

    sad Re: TATA Indicom Broadband is costly

    Quote Originally Posted by ABHAYK View Post
    Reliance offering Unlimited 300 kbps speed at Rs. 800 per month.
    I'm using Reliance Broadnet(wired) 75kbps Unlimited @Rs.499+Service Tax.....

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Posts
    49

    Re: TATA Indicom Broadband is costly

    This offer is to reliance existing customer and new customer who is in 150 Kbps plan monthly rental Rs. 750 for that you have to pay Rs.50 + service tax and you will get 300 Kbps speed. There is no problem with reliance.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Kolkata
    Posts
    60

    sad Re: TATA Indicom Broadband is costly

    Quote Originally Posted by ABHAYK View Post
    This offer is to reliance existing customer and new customer who is in 150 Kbps plan monthly rental Rs. 750 for that you have to pay Rs.50 + service tax and you will get 300 Kbps speed. There is no problem with reliance.
    This means I will not get 300kbps @Rs.800.....

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Posts
    49

    Re: TATA Indicom Broadband is costly

    No, You will get 300 Kbps speed at Rs. 800 + Service tax. per month Don't cry
    See Reliance Offer : Here

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Kolkata
    Posts
    60

    cool Re: TATA Indicom Broadband is costly

    Quote Originally Posted by ABHAYK View Post
    No, You will get 300 Kbps speed at Rs. 800 + Service tax. per month Don't cry
    See Reliance Offer : Here
    @ABHAYK
    Thanks.....

    Is the above plans only for Reliance BroadNet(Wired & Postpaid) ?
    Because,I'm planning to take Reliance WiMax(don't know postpaid or prepaid).
    Currently I have Reliance prepaid.. broadband but unfortunately Reliance are planing to stop their prepaid broadband.....

Similar Threads

  1. Tata indicom broadband speed test
    By OctAvio2011 in forum India BroadBand
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 09-10-2010, 04:40 PM
  2. What is Tata Indicom Broadband 2.0
    By Lankesh in forum India BroadBand
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 18-01-2010, 07:37 PM
  3. Reliance And TATA Broadband modem is very costly
    By Omprakash in forum India BroadBand
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 12-05-2009, 11:42 PM
  4. TATA Indicom Broadband Download speed is low
    By Amit_k in forum India BroadBand
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 08-04-2009, 07:06 PM
  5. Problem with TATA indicom broadband
    By Monil in forum India BroadBand
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 19-02-2009, 01:20 PM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Page generated in 1,711,716,991.24310 seconds with 17 queries