|
| ||||||||||
| Tags: fiio e5, fiio e7, fiio e9, headphone, maverick d1, ultrasone pro 2500 |
![]() |
| | Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
#1
| |||
| |||
| Maverick D1 vs. FiiO E9+E7
|
|
#2
| |||
| |||
| Re: Maverick D1 vs. FiiO E9+E7
I currently make use of Ultrasone Pro 2500, which are 40 ohms. It is quite simple to drive. They are paired in the company of a Fiio E5 and a Sony Walkman MP3 player as the main source. While I be able to hear the pleasant improvements, other than subtle E5 ago, I have to say that my sound 2500S sexy no matter whether or not an amplifier. However, I rarely leave 2500S making my E5. I approximating my 2500S and I have actually wanted to observe what a desktop amp can do for them. |
|
#3
| |||
| |||
| Re: Maverick D1 vs. FiiO E9+E7
Do not fail to remember the D1 has a tube out. Remarkable question, I wonder, so it is "better" because E7 + E9 are recommended all the time to start. Not that I'm always thinking of getting a product Fiio. I have never heard the Maverick D1, so I cannot talk about it, however I am able to say that the E7/E9 SQ does not leave greatly to be desired and positively does not experience from any whisper whatsoever. I hope this will help you to understand about this. |
|
#4
| |||
| |||
| Re: Maverick D1 vs. FiiO E9+E7
Thanks for this awesome. However, in my case my ultrasound is not difficult to handle. However, I heard that today will bring Lotsa qualities. The E-9 might be too much for my ultrasound where the Maverick would be sufficient. In several cases, raw power is not my major apprehension. Can you comment on the sound qualities of mutually? Any problems whistle Maverick? It is assumed that the headphone output resting on the Maverick is "meh"? |
|
#5
| |||
| |||
| Re: Maverick D1 vs. FiiO E9+E7
The headphone amplifier on the Maverick is actually IMO MEH. I even had chosen the dac portion of the uDac in excess of the D1 additionally. Please note my Maverick was completely stock and never tried the pre spout. I never noticed any hiss, but never tried it with SIAA either. I just tried to D2000s, 990/600s k702s and DT at the time he had. It was my first dac and amp to get my feet drenched in this relaxation, and I do not really know what to listen to when I pay money for it, so I do not imagine I be able to give a completely fair illustration to its refinement. |
|
#6
| |||
| |||
| Re: Maverick D1 vs. FiiO E9+E7
In comparison I was impressed by the uDac little. When I received it, believe it or not, most of this was attributed to the dac however. The 600 ohm Beyers sounded downright anemic in the uDac (as they should), but the D1 do not drive much better-a little harder, yes, but still sounded like crap, frankly. It was not until later I heard the Beyers within Asgard and afterward the 880/600s in an E9; I felt I was hearing correctly cast. |
![]() |
|
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| |
Similar Threads for: "Maverick D1 vs. FiiO E9+E7" | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| MacBook Pro and Maverick Meerkat (Ubuntu 10.10) | Akbarha | Operating Systems | 10 | 24-01-2012 11:42 PM |
| Fiio E7/E9 vs Fubar IV vs Little Dot MK V | Whitfield | Hardware Peripherals | 5 | 21-04-2011 10:43 AM |
| USB DAC not working with FIIO E9 + E7 | Aganju | Hardware Peripherals | 4 | 18-04-2011 11:23 PM |
| Is Fiio E9 (E7+E9) better for D7000 | Chuma | Hardware Peripherals | 6 | 18-04-2011 11:23 PM |
| IS Fiio e9+e7 is better than Nuforce HDP? | Dabir | Hardware Peripherals | 4 | 18-04-2011 11:22 PM |