Need help to configure new hard drive on raid 1

[$Bradan$]

It was an inopportune fact by means of the intention of hard disk drives is to a certain extent sluggish at storing and retrieving data. Certain they are faster than CDs, linear backup tapes and additional detachable media, additional than evaluate to actual system memory, they lag behind particularly. The mechanical environment of Hard Disk Drive (HDD) technology determine to constantly hold it back when evaluate to a merely electronic storage apparatus such as a stick of RAM or a Solid State Drive (SSD). The obsession is, our reliance on hard drives has if no matter which increased in excess of the years, at the same time as the technology they are pedestal on has changed diminutive. Modern software necessitate ever-increasing amounts of disk space and free memory, most important to constant hard drive access both to retrieve data from the program directory and to store data in the 'virtual memory' space to have with the intention of Windows position aside on the hard drive.

[Yitzchak909]

The Hard drives are quicker in terms of relocate data than they utilized to be, primarily due to increases in the speed of the interface (the IDE and Serial ATA organizer) connecting the drive and the rest of the system. In excess of the course of the previous a small number of years, the customary has disappeared commencing 33MB/s from side to side 100MB/s and 133MB/s, and at present reaches 150MB/s and 300MB/s by means of Serial ATA and SATA II drives. The tribulations remain by means of the intention of the speed by means of the intention of the controller transfers data not be able to cover up the real restriction of hard drives, the fact information in sequence by means of the intention of due to their mechanical nature they be able to merely retrieve and send data to the controller at a certain speed.

[pddaugusto]

In the majority IDE drives are obtainable at speeds of 5400 and 7200 RPM, which designate how fast the hard disk platters surrounded by the drive are spinning. The sequential ATA drives are characteristically paced at 7200RPM. This eventually dictates how fast the drive is able to retrieve and store information in sequence. In view of the fact by means of the intention of the read/write heads of the drive be able to move back and forth by the side of the surface of the disk platters, the faster the platter rotates, the supplementary rapidly the head be able to reach dissimilar sections of the disk; somewhat approximating like a record player (additional than not accurately). There are even 10,000 RPM SATA/IDE drives obtainable, normally aimed at business submission or performance users. Utilizing SCSI (Small Computer Systems Interface) controllers, a substitute to IDE and SATA, permits for faster transfer rates, additional than this hardware is considerably additional expensive for the reason by means of the intention of it is engineered for greater procedure demands in servers.

[Howitzer]

I am innovative to this so I anticipate you determine to bear by means of me. I have comprised a Fujitsu Esprimo Raid1. It presently has 2 hard drives in it. This scrupulous system runs 1 of our subdivision at work. Is it worth it to purchase a couple of additional HDs and mirror them and maintain them on hand. I went at the forefront and endeavor this and it did not seem to run. It downgraded the primary HD and would not give permission me rebuild it so it would mirror the 2nd HD I position in there. It held in reserve saying there was not sufficient free space. Might somebody perhaps point me in the right direction on this one. Speaking of creating a backup RAID 1 array and then eliminating it commencing the system to position back in, if desirable. Immediately add additional disks to the RAID 1 array if by means of the intention of is what you are endeavoring to accomplish.

[Wampanoag]

There is merely room for 2 HDs. My sympathetic is a Raid 1 is for mirroring merely, right. Meaning together hard drives are superfluous, right. So if the master fails or gets degraded does not the additional HD fail as well in view of the fact by means of the intention of it's constantly a mirror image. Be supposed to I have encompassed a spare HD or 2 by means of the intention of are mirrors commencing a preceding time in case this occurs. No, if one hard drive failed, you would tranquil encompass a duplicate drive to boot commencing. You would immediately necessitate to replace the drive by means of an identical matching model (I would), for it to start the array the entire in excess of again. It's presently if 2 drives failed at on one occasion for a number of reason, by means of the intention of you would lose the entire data. I utilize RAID 1 myself, and encompass been backing up, in view of the fact by means of the intention of one hard drive has reported it is going to fail.

[Pomegranate]

I did purchase 2 additional identical drives. The most recent 2 I might locate in view of the fact with the intention of they have comprised and been discontinued. I shut the system down and position back the 2nd drive by means of the innovative 1 expecting it to mirror the master. This did not occur. It said the master was besmirched or downgraded, not be able to remember which at present. I went into the Raid manager and endeavor to re-enable it and it supposed there was not sufficient space. Do I necessitate going into the Intel Matrix Storage Console and position the Array back up. I have encompassed to be cautious not to wipe the master when I do this, right. They were position up by means of the projects beforehand. How do I be familiar by means of if it's hot swappable be able to I immediately pull 1 of the drives out and position the additional in or determine to I run into the similar difficulty stated on top of.