|
| |||||||||
| Tags: 600 sb chipsets, sata hard disks, windows xp |
![]() |
| | Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
#1
| ||||
| ||||
| Native IDE vs Raid
I'm running Windows Xp as my operating system. I am looking into using a RAID 1 configuration with 2 SATA hard disks at 3.0gps. I've been using native IDE. My motherboard has the AMD 790FX NB and 600 SB chipsets. How much of a performance increase, as well as any other advantages, would I have with the RAID 1 compared to the Native IDE? Can any body tell me the actual differences native ide and raid? Does any body knows about it? Kindly provide me the correct information on the above issue. |
|
#2
| ||||
| ||||
| Re: Native IDE vs Raid
Since your motherboard has the Silicon Image SATA/RAID ports, any connected drives are limited by the PCI bus, so will perform similarly to an IDE hard drive(s). ATI SB600 SATA controller supports 4 modes: Legacy IDE, Native IDE, AHCI and RAID. Legacy/Native IDE mode is designed for compatibility with some old OS without AHCI driver but looses SATAII/AHCI features such as NCQ. |
|
#3
| ||||
| ||||
| Re: Native IDE vs Raid
If you want RAID-0 you need 2 Hard drives partitioned for RAID, you will need the RAID drivers as well and a floppy drive the drivers can be loaded to a floppy. The system stability is not effected by a RAID configuration. You also will need to set your SATA controller to RAID in Bios. When using RAID, the read/write speed is substantially improved over a single drive. In theory the read/write speed is twice the single drive.You will not be able to run RAID and a SATA DVD drive or SATA cd drive on the same controller they are SATA/native IDE You also wont be able to use any SATA/Native IDE or IDE/PATA Hard drives on that controller. |
|
#4
| ||||
| ||||
| Re: Native IDE vs Raid
RAID is available for your motherboard in 2 flavors: RAID0 (striping) or RAID1 (mirroring). You know RAID1 hardly comes with any performance benefit, and in fact on driver RAID will just behave as a single disk. Writes may even be a little slower. So you are not comparing RAID against PATA; you are comparing your SATA drive against your PATA drive. Both PATA and SATA are IDE, by the way. I would advise against RAID1, because its better to make a backup, either manually or automated synchronisation. This protects against more dangers and relieves you of using RAID drivers which may not work flawlessly on Windows. |
![]() |
|
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| |
Similar Threads for: "Native IDE vs Raid" | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| How can I use Raid 0 + Raid 1 + Raid 1 in Asus P8P67 PRO? | Thenral | Motherboard Processor & RAM | 5 | 10-07-2011 11:17 AM |
| Nvidia MediaShield RAID and Intel Storage Matrix RAID compatibility | vistachio | Motherboard Processor & RAM | 1 | 21-06-2008 10:38 PM |
| Raid 5 with Vista Ultimate x64 on non Raid drive... No boot disk detected! | ThaClown | Vista Hardware Devices | 4 | 07-03-2008 09:02 PM |
| Vista x64 dual boot WinXP with RAID-5 ICH8R messes up RAID array | xgraph | Vista Setup and Install | 1 | 19-02-2007 11:55 AM |
| Solution to CERC SATA Raid 2S STOP error 0x0000007b RAID install WITHOUT having to reloading the OS Windows XP | Networks | XP Hardware | 2 | 08-03-2006 12:45 AM |