Results 1 to 5 of 5

Thread: Silicon Image 3512 (Raid 0) suffers the write speed

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    2,180

    Silicon Image 3512 (Raid 0) suffers the write speed

    My config:

    Motherboard: Asrock K7NF2-RAID (nforce2 ultra 400)
    Processor: AMD Athlon 3000 + (13x166Mhz)
    Memory: 1 DDR 2x1GB in dual (@166MHz 2.5/3/3/7)
    1 hard disk controller: NVraid SATA I Raid 0 (2 Western Digital WD3200KS (320GB SATA II 16MB))
    2 hard disk controller (PCI): Silicon Image 3512 SATA I Raid 0 (2 Western Digital WD3200KS (320GB SATA II 16MB))

    Here is my problem, the write speed on the Silicon controller is abnormally low. Yet I have the latest bios (4.3.84) and latest drivers Raid (1.0.60). At the beginning I wondered if it was not a problem of write cache but not in the device manager it is enabled (and you can not disable this). Incidentally or not I usually advanced performance does not change the problem. I check the device utility installed along with the driver. I also installed the Silicon raidtools that allows you to enable/disable write caching. If I disable write caching, its even worse! Someone already had this problem? Has an idea of the problem?

  2. #2
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    1,395

    Re: Silicon Image 3512 (Raid 0) suffers the write speed

    You would not be limited by the speed of your PCI slot? (133 Mb/s theoretical, but if there are other things connected, I assume that the bandwidth is divided by the number of devices connected)

    Although even limited by your PCI slot, the flows are very low.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    2,180

    Re: Silicon Image 3512 (Raid 0) suffers the write speed

    I do not because:

    1. why would I be limited in writing and not reading?
    2. why my other raid controller is not limited?

    Also if I copy a file (4.37 GB):
    NvidiaRaid to SiliconRaid: 2min20s = 32MB/s
    SiliconRaid to NvidiaRaid: 42s = 106 MB/s

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    475

    Re: Silicon Image 3512 (Raid 0) suffers the write speed

    nVidia controller directly into the northbridge
    silicon external controller must pass by a bus

    but why such a difference between writing and reading?

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    2,180

    Re: Silicon Image 3512 (Raid 0) suffers the write speed

    Well this is an incompatibility between the silicon card (or bios/driver) and my motherboard.

    - I removed all other PCI on PC ---> Same result
    - I turned off all possible devices in the BIOS of the motherboard (Ethernet/floppy/Sound/IDE/SATA/USB) ---> Same result
    - I tried all PCI slots on the motherboard -> Same result
    - I have tested in the bios setting "PCI IDE busmaster" to enable & disable ---> Same result
    - I tried 2 other hard drives (Maxtor 16MB SATA I DiamondMax10) ---> Same result
    - I tried another silicon card ---> Same result

    - Then I tested the card on another silicon PC (PIII450 in 1998/2 with Maxtor) -> And everything is normal

    I will try the other bios and drivers but I smell the scorched!

Similar Threads

  1. Silicon Image RAID Controller unusable
    By Pencil-Guy in forum Windows Software
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 06-01-2011, 08:08 PM
  2. Silicon image 3132 raid driver
    By giorgos in forum Operating Systems
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 02-06-2009, 01:06 PM
  3. Silicon Image SATA RAID controller - RAID only possible?
    By attitude.ashwin in forum Hardware Peripherals
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 19-02-2009, 07:53 PM
  4. Silicon Image SiI 0680 Ultra-133 Medley ATA Raid Controller
    By taher in forum Vista Hardware Devices
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 30-08-2008, 05:44 PM
  5. Silicon Image RAID Windows Update Corruption
    By sigep441 in forum Vista Help
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 09-11-2007, 08:33 AM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Page generated in 1,714,190,213.11696 seconds with 17 queries