|
| |||||||||
| Tags: antivirus, bad, norton, symantec |
![]() |
| | Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
#1
| |||
| |||
| Symantec Norton Anti-Virus -- good? bad? (By accident I got it free a year ago.) Should I renew? I sense dislike for Norton here but don't know why. Mason C running private PC politely |
|
#2
| |||
| |||
| Re: Symantec Norton Anti-Virus -- good? bad?
On Tue, 01 Jul 2008 18:37:11 -0700, Mason C <masoncXXX@XXXfrontal-lobe.info> wrote: >My Noton anti-virus is about to expire. > (By accident I got it free a year ago.) > >Should I renew? I sense dislike for Norton here but don't know why. It's crap, I have 6 months left on a subscription and have quit using it because it finds nothing that's really dangerous. |
|
#3
| |||
| |||
| Re: Symantec Norton Anti-Virus -- good? bad?
Bud wrote: > Mason C <masoncXXX@XXXfrontal-lobe.info> wrote: >>My Noton anti-virus is about to expire. >> (By accident I got it free a year ago.) >> >> Should I renew? I sense dislike for Norton here but don't know why. > > It's crap, I have 6 months left on a subscription and have quit using > it because it finds nothing that's really dangerous. That isn't a good reason to quit using it. No anti-virus app ever found anything on my computers either -- because there was never anything to find. Practicing Safe Hex allows that. The real reason to quit using it is because it is a bloated app that hogs your resources and slows down your computer. So does McAfee. Try Avast or AntiVir. Both free. -- -bts -Friends don't let friends drive Windows |
|
#4
| |||
| |||
| Re: Symantec Norton Anti-Virus -- good? bad?
On Tue, 01 Jul 2008 18:37:11 -0700 Mason C wrote: > My Noton anti-virus is about to expire. > (By accident I got it free a year ago.) > > Should I renew? I sense dislike for Norton here but don't know why. > > Mason C running private PC politely > IMHO if you like it then renew it. I had bad experience with Norton and tried several other AV programs, finally settling on Avast. -- Ernie B. Communication: The art of moving an idea from one mind to another, hopefully without distortion. |
|
#5
| |||
| |||
| Re: Symantec Norton Anti-Virus -- good? bad?
On Tue, 01 Jul 2008 18:37:11 -0700, Mason C wrote: > My Noton anti-virus is about to expire. Good! > Should I renew? No! > I sense dislike for Norton here but don't know why. Right, read other posts. Then download and run the Norton Removal Tool http://service1.symantec.com/SUPPORT...05033108162039 Choose one (1): Avira AntiVir® Personal - FREE Antivirus http://www.free-av.com/ You may wish to consider removing the 'AntiVir Nagscreen' http://www.elitekiller.com/files/dis...ntivir_nag.htm or Free antivirus - avast! 4 Home Edition It includes ANTI-SPYWARE protection, certified by the West Coast Labs Checkmark process, and ANTI-ROOTKIT DETECTION based on the best-in class GMER technology. http://www.avast.com/eng/avast_4_home.html (Choose Custom Installation and under Resident Protection, uncheck: Internet Mail and Outlook/Exchange.) or AVG Anti-Virus Free Edition http://free.grisoft.com/ (Choose custom install and untick the email scanner plugin.) or ESET NOD32 Antivirus - Not Free http://www.eset.com/ or Kaspersky® Anti-Virus 7.0 - Not Free http://www.kaspersky.com/homeuser FYI Why You Don't Need Your Anti-Virus Program to Scan Your E-Mail http://thundercloud.net/infoave/tuto...ning/index.htm |
|
#6
| |||
| |||
| Re: Symantec Norton Anti-Virus -- good? bad?
The first thing I do for my computer clients is to uninstall the bloated and expensive Norton AV which tries to take over your computer. I then replace it with AVG free which is easy to use and costs nothing and is better than Norton in several ways. I should add, that I have had no trouble with the latest AVG v8 free version as one or two people seem to have had. -- Yours Quilly, http://quilljar.users.btopenworld.com/ "Mason C" <masoncXXX@XXXfrontal-lobe.info> wrote in message news:gkml6494a78h5ke1vfv8ub3743ijs772sb@4ax.com... > My Noton anti-virus is about to expire. > (By accident I got it free a year ago.) > > Should I renew? I sense dislike for Norton here but don't know why. > > Mason C running private PC politely |
|
#7
| |||
| |||
| Re: Symantec Norton Anti-Virus -- good? bad?
Mason C wrote: > My Noton anti-virus is about to expire. > (By accident I got it free a year ago.) > > Should I renew? I sense dislike for Norton here but don't know why. > > Mason C running private PC politely Norton and McAfee had their heyday years ago. But seems lately the two of them cause more issues than the solve. Or at least you read about it. I got a next to free copy one year and just about choked the computer. You seem to have no issue now, and if you are not getting a new version of software, just extending the license, it may still continue to work just as well. If you've had no viruses, then maybe its doing its job, that or you practice safe surfing. Some of the complaints may also be the combination of applications. So its hard to say. I run AVG8.0 and like it, but others have complained. So you see, there's no accounting for problems. Its a gamble. Yes, you can take an educated guess, but that's about all it is. |
|
#8
| |||
| |||
| Re: Symantec Norton Anti-Virus -- good? bad?
On Tue, 1 Jul 2008 23:24:12 -0400, "Beauregard T. Shagnasty" <a.nony.mous@example.invalid> wrote: >Bud wrote: > >> Mason C <masoncXXX@XXXfrontal-lobe.info> wrote: >>>My Noton anti-virus is about to expire. >>> (By accident I got it free a year ago.) >>> >>> Should I renew? I sense dislike for Norton here but don't know why. >> >> It's crap, I have 6 months left on a subscription and have quit using >> it because it finds nothing that's really dangerous. > >That isn't a good reason to quit using it. No anti-virus app ever found >anything on my computers either -- because there was never anything to >find. Practicing Safe Hex allows that. I should have been more clear about Norton. I knew there was a problem, I DLed AntiVir and it found all kinds of crap. Then I DLed AVG Free 8 and it found more crap, then updated and ran Spybot S&R and that finally found the last of it. That's why I dumped Norton. All that stuff found it's way on to my machine while on Norton's watch. When I installed Norton it clained it couldn't run on a machine that was using Zomealarm so I install the Sygate FW, I think that was the beginning of the end. Live and learn, then you die. >Try Avast or AntiVir. Both free. I'm running, all at the same time: AntiVir, AVG free 8, Spybot S&D, Super Antispyware, and they all get along so far and unlike others, I've had no speed problem from any of them. |
|
#9
| |||
| |||
| Re: Symantec Norton Anti-Virus -- good? bad?
Bud wrote: > All that stuff found it's way on to my machine while on Norton's > watch. Well, there's a great testimonial! <lol> > I'm running, all at the same time: > AntiVir, AVG free 8, Hopefully, you aren't running two *resident* apps at the same time. They will surely conflict with each other (same as two firewalls). It's ok to keep several on hand for *on-demand* scanning, but not full-time running. > Spybot S&D, Super Antispyware, and they all get along so far and > unlike others, I've had no speed problem from any of them. ...so long as they aren't running at the same time, there should be no problems. An alternative to needing all those tools is to switch to an impervious operating system. <g> -- -bts -Friends don't let friends drive Windows |
|
#10
| |||
| |||
| Re: Symantec Norton Anti-Virus -- good? bad?
Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote: >It's ok to >keep several on hand for *on-demand* scanning, but not full-time >running. On Demand is the only way I've ever configured any AV scanner. My most recent is the a-squared freebie, http://tinyurl.com/2gb93 Pros - frequent sig-file updates, the right price, and can be integrated into the right click context. Cons - starts a process that is hard to kill when it finishes a full scan, doesn't happen on a single object scan however. I haven't bothered to look around for any 'samples' to test it with yet. Anyone have any opinions on it? |
|
#11
| |||
| |||
| Re: Symantec Norton Anti-Virus -- good? bad? Bud wrote: > On Tue, 1 Jul 2008 23:24:12 -0400, "Beauregard T. Shagnasty" > <a.nony.mous@example.invalid> wrote: > >Bud wrote: > > > >> Mason C <masoncXXX@XXXfrontal-lobe.info> wrote: > >>>My Noton anti-virus is about to expire. > >>> (By accident I got it free a year ago.) > >>> > >>> Should I renew? I sense dislike for Norton here but don't know why. > >> > >> It's crap, I have 6 months left on a subscription and have quit using > >> it because it finds nothing that's really dangerous. > > > >That isn't a good reason to quit using it. No anti-virus app ever found > >anything on my computers either -- because there was never anything to > >find. Practicing Safe Hex allows that. > > I should have been more clear about Norton. I knew there was a > problem, I DLed AntiVir and it found all kinds of crap. Then I DLed > AVG Free 8 and it found more crap, then updated and ran Spybot S&R and > that finally found the last of it. That's why I dumped Norton. > All that stuff found it's way on to my machine while on Norton's > watch. When I installed Norton it clained it couldn't run on a machine > that was using Zomealarm so I install the Sygate FW, I think that was > the beginning of the end. Live and learn, then you die. > > >Try Avast or AntiVir. Both free. > > I'm running, all at the same time: > AntiVir, AVG free 8, Spybot S&D, Super Antispyware, and they all get > along so far and unlike others, I've had no speed problem from any of > them. Really surprising that there are no conflicts between different anti-virus programs. That has not been my experience. Also, AVG free 8 runs ok on my Vista quad machine with 2 gig, but bogs down my Athlon 1.3 Gig machine with 500 meg. AVG 7.5 seemed to be less resource demanding, and certainly more user friendly. Sherwin D. |
|
#12
| |||
| |||
| Re: Symantec Norton Anti-Virus -- good? bad?
On Thu, 03 Jul 2008 02:01:22 -0500, sherwindu <sherwindu@comcast.net> wrote: > Really surprising that there are no conflicts between different anti-virus > programs. That has not been my experience. Also, AVG free 8 runs > ok on my Vista quad machine with 2 gig, but bogs down my Athlon > 1.3 Gig machine with 500 meg. AVG 7.5 seemed to be less resource > demanding, and certainly more user friendly. From what I've been reading here, my machine should be crawling, but it's not. When I installed all those I figured that I'd run them for a while and see how it went and then turn off the ones that appeared to be slowing me down, I haven't had to do that yet. AMD 2700+, 1GB RAM, 1TB hard drives, XP Pro I noticed that Norton is offering AV for Linux, is that really necessary? |
|
#13
| |||
| |||
| Re: Symantec Norton Anti-Virus -- good? bad?
From: "Bud" <k7kkg@yahoo.com> | On Thu, 03 Jul 2008 02:01:22 -0500, sherwindu <sherwindu@comcast.net> | wrote: >> Really surprising that there are no conflicts between different anti-virus >> programs. That has not been my experience. Also, AVG free 8 runs >> ok on my Vista quad machine with 2 gig, but bogs down my Athlon >> 1.3 Gig machine with 500 meg. AVG 7.5 seemed to be less resource >> demanding, and certainly more user friendly. | From what I've been reading here, my machine should be crawling, but | it's not. When I installed all those I figured that I'd run them for a | while and see how it went and then turn off the ones that appeared to | be slowing me down, I haven't had to do that yet. | AMD 2700+, 1GB RAM, 1TB hard drives, XP Pro | I noticed that Norton is offering AV for Linux, is that really | necessary? Installing an AV solution is prudent. Using Norton's solution is not. -- Dave http://www.claymania.com/removal-trojan-adware.html Multi-AV - http://www.pctipp.ch/downloads/dl/35905.asp |
|
#14
| |||
| |||
| Re: Symantec Norton Anti-Virus -- good? bad?
On Thu, 03 Jul 2008 15:40:39 -0400, Bud <k7kkg@yahoo.com> wrote: > I noticed that Norton is offering AV for Linux, is that really > necessary? Only if the linux system is being used to process email, or other files destined for an m$ system. Regards, Dave Hodgins -- Change nomail.afraid.org to ody.ca to reply by email. (nomail.afraid.org has been set up specifically for use in usenet. Feel free to use it yourself.) |
|
#15
| |||
| |||
| Re: Symantec Norton Anti-Virus -- good? bad?
Mason C wrote: > My Noton anti-virus is about to expire. > (By accident I got it free a year ago.) > > Should I renew? I sense dislike for Norton here but don't know why. > > Mason C running private PC politely Norton is a terrible resource hog and little by little, I've uninstalled everything Norton from my machine. I've been extremely happy with ESET NOD - I'm just using the AV (not the new suite). This is my third year with it, my daughter uses it also, and both of us are very pleased. It is quite low on resource usage, updated definitions frequently and without a lot of fanfare - it just works and works well. It has also "caught" a couple of things over the years when I've gone to some "iffy" websites. You do have to pay for it, but think of the "cost" of getting your system infected and/or having its resources overused on a daily basis. Louise |
![]() |
|
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| |
Similar Threads for: "Symantec Norton Anti-Virus -- good? bad?" | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Back-door: Win32/VBbot.V threat detected by Symantec anti virus | KANAN14 | Networking & Security | 5 | 3 Weeks Ago 09:37 PM |
| Free Anti-virus Are Not As Good As Paid Ones? | napoleon | Polls & Voting | 7 | 11-06-2009 01:57 PM |
| Download Latest Symantec Norton AntiVirus Virus Definition | Effren | Windows Software | 0 | 21-11-2008 06:38 PM |
| Symantec Anti-Virus Update | Priscila | Windows Update | 2 | 04-10-2008 11:43 AM |
| Good SBS 2003 Anti-Virus Solution? | John Marra | Small Business Server | 4 | 18-04-2007 10:17 PM |