|
| ||||||||||
| Tags: dns, domain controller, ip address, nic |
![]() |
| | Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
#1
| ||||
| ||||
| Domain Controller Multiple NIC DNS problem
|
|
#2
| ||||
| ||||
|
You can try to enable or disable DNS updates in Windows 2000 and in Windows Server 2003, just follow the steps given here - http://support.microsoft.com/?id=246804 |
|
#3
| |||
| |||
| Re: Domain Controller Multiple NIC DNS problem
Hello . I have read the responses , but find the solutions rather confusing. In my case, the second NIC card in my Win2003 DC , DNS, & DHCP server is connected to a switch dedicated for Internal Backup purposes only and with another IP subnet 192.168.x.x. It has File and Print, MS Client, DNS and Netbios all disabled. Yet when I Enable the secondary card, after a short while, the secondary DNS IP number is propogated thruout the primary card network and my users begin to experience connection errors. Is there a simple solution to this? Thanks for any advice or suggestions, I am at my wits end with this... |
|
#4
| ||||
| ||||
| Re: Domain Controller Multiple NIC DNS problem
I have checked the NIC binding order with the protocols help but thats not the case for 100% of the problem. MS wouldnt suggest having a DC to be multihomed, that is, having multiple NICs in the DC connected. You can plan on changing that in the neat future rather than fixing the symtoms. |
|
#5
| |||
| |||
|
This is very interesting info. Where can I find your step-by-step? What if a virtual multihomed DC is deployed and configured with a single virtual nic and a second virtual NIC is installed/configured in the last step of the installation/configuration process? Anyone has experience with this? |
|
#6
| ||||
| ||||
|
Usually a multi-homed DC is a multihomed DC, whether physical or virtual is not relevant, it is still the same thing. Check the article below for more information: Active Directory Communication Fails on Multihomed Domain Controllers http://support.microsoft.com/default...b;en-us;272294 Symptoms of Multihomed Browsers http://support.microsoft.com/default...b;EN-US;191611 |
|
#7
| |||
| |||
| Re: Domain Controller Multiple NIC DNS problem
I accidentally multihomed my DC by plugging the network cable into the wrong NIC, I don't want it to be multihomed and have plugged the network cable into the correct NIC. Can this write up be adapted to remove the binding to the second NIC? Every time i delete it in the DNS (which is also on the DC) it reappears each time it reloads. Cheers guys this might just save my bacon |
|
#8
| ||||
| ||||
| Re: Domain Controller Multiple NIC DNS problem
You can try to disable the unused NIC in networking section. Or, it will still try to register even with any ip address. If it is disabled then Windows ignores it. |
|
#9
| |||
| |||
| Re: Domain Controller Multiple NIC DNS problem
Thank you so much, that has done the trick, DNS back up to full speed. |
|
#10
| |||
| |||
| Re: Domain Controller Multiple NIC DNS problem
Guys, I know this was the case in DC's running WIN 2000 and 2003. Was it resolved in later versions of active directory? Does 2008 R2 for example display the same issue with the don't multihome rules? Rgds Steve P |
![]() |
|
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| |
Similar Threads for: "Domain Controller Multiple NIC DNS problem" | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Multiple IP & Domain Problem | Oswaldo | Networking & Security | 3 | 13-09-2010 08:26 AM |
| Problem of domain controller naming | KADEEM | Networking & Security | 3 | 07-10-2009 07:07 PM |
| When you run Dcpromo.exe on Windows 2008 to create a replica domain controller, you receive a message "The operation failed because: A domain controller could not be contacted ... "Access is denied." | John Wu | Active Directory | 4 | 15-05-2009 11:48 AM |
| problem in configuration additional domain controller | sunil kumar verma | Operating Systems | 2 | 15-12-2008 11:03 AM |
| Windows 2003 Server Standard Domain Controller multiple NICs | pushpendra | Active Directory | 3 | 25-10-2007 12:00 AM |