|
| |||||||||
| Tags: 2008, extending, schema |
![]() |
| | Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
#1
| |||
| |||
| Extending the schema in Windows Server 2008?
Hi All! Are there any changes to the way Windows Server 2008 handles schema extensions? Will existing software that modifies the schema continue to work or are there additional considerations to look out for? Or, to put it even broader: Are there any changes in the schema infrastructure? I know that W2K8 updates the schema (as does Exchange, and R2 and all kinds of software), but that is not what I am interested in. I am interested in changes to the underlying schema technology, e.g. when Windows Server 2003 came along, it was suddenly possible to reuse OIDs of disabled schema attributes, which wasn't possible in Windows 2000. That kind of change. New features, or changes in existing features or deprecations of features. Does anybody know of any changes or has first-hand experience with extending the schema in W2K8 by whatever means (script, LDIFDE, GUI)? Unfortunately, searching the web and the newsgroups didn't turn up anything. I'd be grateful for any kind of advice or for any experiences shared. Best regards Nils Loeber |
|
#2
| |||
| |||
| Re: Extending the schema in Windows Server 2008?
Existing software should continue to work. Autogeneration of link IDs is now documented in MSDN, so you should probably start using that if you weren't already. That feature existed in 2003 but wasn't documented. There are some interesting new searchFlags values you can set, although curiously they have not been documented by the MSDN team but are coming in as community content from the MVPs. These relate to the RODC filtered attribute set and audit limitations. There is also a typo in the MSDN docs that is mentioned. http://msdn2.microsoft.com/en-us/lib...65(VS.85).aspx I hope that helps some. I'm not aware of any other major changes. For example, there is still no full schema delete capability. Joe K. -- Joe Kaplan-MS MVP Directory Services Programming Co-author of "The .NET Developer's Guide to Directory Services Programming" http://www.directoryprogramming.net -- "Nils Löber" <nloeber***REMOVETHIS4SPAMREASONS***@nils-loeber.de> wrote in message news:33E1C897-4D10-40D8-AB4C-97ACA4AE61C3@microsoft.com... > Hi All! > > Are there any changes to the way Windows Server 2008 handles schema > extensions? Will existing software that modifies the schema continue to > work or are there additional considerations to look out for? > > Or, to put it even broader: Are there any changes in the schema > infrastructure? > > I know that W2K8 updates the schema (as does Exchange, and R2 and all > kinds of software), but that is not what I am interested in. I am > interested in changes to the underlying schema technology, e.g. when > Windows Server 2003 came along, it was suddenly possible to reuse OIDs of > disabled schema attributes, which wasn't possible in Windows 2000. That > kind of change. New features, or changes in existing features or > deprecations of features. > > Does anybody know of any changes or has first-hand experience with > extending the schema in W2K8 by whatever means (script, LDIFDE, GUI)? > > Unfortunately, searching the web and the newsgroups didn't turn up > anything. > > I'd be grateful for any kind of advice or for any experiences shared. > > Best regards > Nils Loeber > > |
|
#3
| |||
| |||
| Re: Extending the schema in Windows Server 2008?
Thank you, Joe. That information is quite useful. Best regards Nils "Joe Kaplan" <joseph.e.kaplan@removethis.accenture.com> schrieb im Newsbeitrag news:eN795NPaIHA.6140@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl... > Existing software should continue to work. > > Autogeneration of link IDs is now documented in MSDN, so you should > probably start using that if you weren't already. That feature existed in > 2003 but wasn't documented. > > There are some interesting new searchFlags values you can set, although > curiously they have not been documented by the MSDN team but are coming in > as community content from the MVPs. These relate to the RODC filtered > attribute set and audit limitations. There is also a typo in the MSDN > docs that is mentioned. > > http://msdn2.microsoft.com/en-us/lib...65(VS.85).aspx > > I hope that helps some. I'm not aware of any other major changes. For > example, there is still no full schema delete capability. > > Joe K. > > -- > Joe Kaplan-MS MVP Directory Services Programming > Co-author of "The .NET Developer's Guide to Directory Services > Programming" > http://www.directoryprogramming.net > -- > "Nils Löber" <nloeber***REMOVETHIS4SPAMREASONS***@nils-loeber.de> wrote in > message news:33E1C897-4D10-40D8-AB4C-97ACA4AE61C3@microsoft.com... >> Hi All! >> >> Are there any changes to the way Windows Server 2008 handles schema >> extensions? Will existing software that modifies the schema continue to >> work or are there additional considerations to look out for? >> >> Or, to put it even broader: Are there any changes in the schema >> infrastructure? >> >> I know that W2K8 updates the schema (as does Exchange, and R2 and all >> kinds of software), but that is not what I am interested in. I am >> interested in changes to the underlying schema technology, e.g. when >> Windows Server 2003 came along, it was suddenly possible to reuse OIDs of >> disabled schema attributes, which wasn't possible in Windows 2000. That >> kind of change. New features, or changes in existing features or >> deprecations of features. >> >> Does anybody know of any changes or has first-hand experience with >> extending the schema in W2K8 by whatever means (script, LDIFDE, GUI)? >> >> Unfortunately, searching the web and the newsgroups didn't turn up >> anything. >> >> I'd be grateful for any kind of advice or for any experiences shared. >> >> Best regards >> Nils Loeber >> >> > > |
|
#4
| |||
| |||
| Re: Extending the schema in Windows Server 2008?
like Joe said, the extension of the searchFlags attribute property for auditing and RODC-FAS another interesting only is that objectClass is now indexed in w2k8 AD. in w2k, w2k3 it was not indexed -- Cheers, (HOPEFULLY THIS INFORMATION HELPS YOU!) # Jorge de Almeida Pinto # MVP Windows Server - Directory Services BLOG (WEB-BASED)--> http://blogs.dirteam.com/blogs/jorge/default.aspx BLOG (RSS-FEEDS)--> http://blogs.dirteam.com/blogs/jorge/rss.aspx ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ * How to ask a question --> http://support.microsoft.com/?id=555375 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ * This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties and confers no rights! * Always test before implementing! ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ################################################# ################################################# ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ "Joe Kaplan" <joseph.e.kaplan@removethis.accenture.com> wrote in message news:eN795NPaIHA.6140@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl... > Existing software should continue to work. > > Autogeneration of link IDs is now documented in MSDN, so you should > probably start using that if you weren't already. That feature existed in > 2003 but wasn't documented. > > There are some interesting new searchFlags values you can set, although > curiously they have not been documented by the MSDN team but are coming in > as community content from the MVPs. These relate to the RODC filtered > attribute set and audit limitations. There is also a typo in the MSDN > docs that is mentioned. > > http://msdn2.microsoft.com/en-us/lib...65(VS.85).aspx > > I hope that helps some. I'm not aware of any other major changes. For > example, there is still no full schema delete capability. > > Joe K. > > -- > Joe Kaplan-MS MVP Directory Services Programming > Co-author of "The .NET Developer's Guide to Directory Services > Programming" > http://www.directoryprogramming.net > -- > "Nils Löber" <nloeber***REMOVETHIS4SPAMREASONS***@nils-loeber.de> wrote in > message news:33E1C897-4D10-40D8-AB4C-97ACA4AE61C3@microsoft.com... >> Hi All! >> >> Are there any changes to the way Windows Server 2008 handles schema >> extensions? Will existing software that modifies the schema continue to >> work or are there additional considerations to look out for? >> >> Or, to put it even broader: Are there any changes in the schema >> infrastructure? >> >> I know that W2K8 updates the schema (as does Exchange, and R2 and all >> kinds of software), but that is not what I am interested in. I am >> interested in changes to the underlying schema technology, e.g. when >> Windows Server 2003 came along, it was suddenly possible to reuse OIDs of >> disabled schema attributes, which wasn't possible in Windows 2000. That >> kind of change. New features, or changes in existing features or >> deprecations of features. >> >> Does anybody know of any changes or has first-hand experience with >> extending the schema in W2K8 by whatever means (script, LDIFDE, GUI)? >> >> Unfortunately, searching the web and the newsgroups didn't turn up >> anything. >> >> I'd be grateful for any kind of advice or for any experiences shared. >> >> Best regards >> Nils Loeber >> >> > > |
![]() |
|
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| |
Similar Threads for: "Extending the schema in Windows Server 2008?" | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Extending the Schema for Credentials Roaming | Nik | Active Directory | 4 | 25-04-2010 06:19 PM |
| Extending ADAM Schema with PKI objects | Buci | Active Directory | 3 | 04-01-2010 05:57 PM |
| Schema upgrade from Server 2003 to Server 2008 R2 fails | Uwe82 | Windows Server Help | 2 | 19-12-2009 01:45 PM |
| Error Upgrading Windows 2003 Schema to Windows 2008 Schema | Megan Kielman | Windows Server Help | 8 | 24-08-2009 05:44 PM |
| Extending ADAM Schema Referral was returned from Server | drew.eugene@gmail.com | Active Directory | 2 | 09-06-2006 01:23 AM |