|
| |||||||||
| Tags: active, directory, practice, structuredesign |
![]() |
| | Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
#1
| |||
| |||
| Best Practice Active Directory Structure/Design
Hello, We are in our organization discussing different architectures for Active Directory. our organization has about 65 sites and across country i am wondering what would be the best solution, 1 domain for all the sites or one domain per site. Could you help us in this investigation? What are the pros and cons of both solutions in this area? Thanks in advance |
|
#2
| |||
| |||
| Re: Best Practice Active Directory Structure/Design
Hello Tal Bar-Or, If you don't have a need for a real security boundary, which requires a separate forest, i would use a single forest domain with one, better 2, DC/DNS/GC in each site and create OUs for each site with the user/computer accounts. This way you can delegate administration to site admins without making them domain admin also. Best regards Meinolf Weber Disclaimer: This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights. ** Please do NOT email, only reply to Newsgroups ** HELP us help YOU!!! http://www.blakjak.demon.co.uk/mul_crss.htm > Hello, > > We are in our organization discussing different architectures for > Active Directory. > > our organization has about 65 sites and across country > > i am wondering what would be the best solution, 1 domain for all the > sites or one domain per site. > > Could you help us in this investigation? > > What are the pros and cons of both solutions in this area? > > Thanks in advance > |
|
#3
| |||
| |||
| Re: Best Practice Active Directory Structure/Design "Tal Bar-Or" <tal_baror@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:u3eYXsYTKHA.5052@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl... > Hello, > > We are in our organization discussing different architectures for Active > Directory. > > our organization has about 65 sites and across country > > i am wondering what would be the best solution, 1 domain for all the > sites or one domain per site. > > Could you help us in this investigation? > > What are the pros and cons of both solutions in this area? > > Thanks in advance > As noted, one domain makes sense, unless security policy requirements dictate more (but certainly not 65). The bigger question is how to design your OU's. An obvious solution is one OU per site. Each OU can have separate group policy. Another option would be OU's for organization functions, like sales or engineering or accounting. You can still have 65 Site objects in AD. Group policies can also be applied to sites. In general, it is best to minimize the number of domains. -- Richard Mueller MVP Directory Services Hilltop Lab - http://www.rlmueller.net -- |
|
#4
| |||
| |||
| Re: Best Practice Active Directory Structure/Design
Thanks :-) "Meinolf Weber [MVP-DS]" <meiweb@(nospam)gmx.de> wrote in message news:6cb2911d795f8cc1bb42aa70704@msnews.microsoft.com... > Hello Tal Bar-Or, > > If you don't have a need for a real security boundary, which requires a > separate forest, i would use a single forest domain with one, better 2, > DC/DNS/GC in each site and create OUs for each site with the user/computer > accounts. This way you can delegate administration to site admins without > making them domain admin also. > > Best regards > > Meinolf Weber > Disclaimer: This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and > confers no rights. > ** Please do NOT email, only reply to Newsgroups > ** HELP us help YOU!!! http://www.blakjak.demon.co.uk/mul_crss.htm > >> Hello, >> >> We are in our organization discussing different architectures for >> Active Directory. >> >> our organization has about 65 sites and across country >> >> i am wondering what would be the best solution, 1 domain for all the >> sites or one domain per site. >> >> Could you help us in this investigation? >> >> What are the pros and cons of both solutions in this area? >> >> Thanks in advance >> > > |
|
#5
| |||
| |||
| Re: Best Practice Active Directory Structure/Design
Hi There's no "one solution fits all". As others said, by general rule 1 Domain/Forest should be enough to perform the job, but there're ather things to consider, OU Design model, Sites Model, GPO, Management, Patching, Security, etc... Before decide anything, you should read some documents that MS has for Active Directory Deployment/Design You can start here Best Practice Active Directory Design for Managing Windows Networks http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/l.../bb727085.aspx Planning an Active Directory Deployment http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/l...78(WS.10).aspx -- I hope that the information above helps you. Have a Nice day. Jorge Silva MVP Directory Services Please no e-mails, any questions should be posted in the NewsGroup This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights. "Tal Bar-Or" <tal_baror@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:u3eYXsYTKHA.5052@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl... > Hello, > > We are in our organization discussing different architectures for Active > Directory. > > our organization has about 65 sites and across country > > i am wondering what would be the best solution, 1 domain for all the > sites or one domain per site. > > Could you help us in this investigation? > > What are the pros and cons of both solutions in this area? > > Thanks in advance > > |
![]() |
|
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| |
Similar Threads for: "Best Practice Active Directory Structure/Design" | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Using active directory structure on Windows 2008 R2 | Unequaled | Active Directory | 3 | 16-12-2010 08:40 PM |
| how to register non-active directory computer in a active directory integrated DNS server | David | Windows Server Help | 8 | 18-09-2009 08:32 PM |
| Directory Design Best Practice | drm | Active Directory | 6 | 19-09-2008 08:57 AM |
| Active Directory best practice design | vonbubba | Active Directory | 3 | 29-05-2008 01:19 AM |
| Active Directory and DMZ design query | Zeno | Active Directory | 4 | 16-02-2008 11:48 AM |