|
| |||||||||
| Tags: containers, default |
![]() |
| | Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
#16
| |||
| |||
| Re: Default containers in AD
"FthrJACK" <FthrJACK.4240zb@DoNotSpam.com> wrote in message news:FthrJACK.4240zb@DoNotSpam.com... > > .in which case the program isnt very well made.... which would lead me > to ask the question "is this thing safe anywhere near my domain??" > > :) > > > not just for aesthetics, i do this myself from time to time, but i > still use the Container. Depending where and what its on it will either > be named "Lost & Found" or i put non DC servers in there, redircmp all > machines to a folder "Workstations" - depends. > > users is the one that is usually wanted to move though... oh and its > not just Aesthetics, its less confusing that having "Computers" > "computers2" > "Workstations" "machines" etc - and some right messes ive seen. > > which OU/CN is that new machine in you just added via RIS/WDS? > > Ah well, each to their own i guess, the guy wanted to know how, and > people where saying its not possible (as is the usual answer if you > google) so i thought id reply with how since this thread does well on > the google ranks. > > > -- > FthrJACK I wouldn't discount a third party app just because it hard codes something like this. I see what you mean about computers, computers2, etc. They that leads me to believe that you are just creating OUs on the root, which is just how I interpreted your post. For example, in my installations, I don't mess with the default containers. I create a sub-structure OU. For example, this is for a small company: CompanyName OU Users Computers Workstations Servers Laptops Termed Users Groups Contacts etc Larger company with locations: Philly OU Users Computers Workstations Servers Laptops Termed Users Groups Contacts Seattle OU Users Computers Workstations Servers Laptops Termed Users Groups Contacts etc This way I can control GPO targeting as well as WSUS targeting. To each their own, I guess. :-) Ace |
|
#17
| |||
| |||
| Re: Default containers in AD "FthrJACK" <FthrJACK.423vfa@DoNotSpam.com> wrote in message news:FthrJACK.423vfa@DoNotSpam.com... > > According to Technet its fine doing this, they just dont explain how: > http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/l...55(WS.10).aspx > > > However, i would only recomend doing it on a new domain setup, incase > you have scripts and such that explicitly point at objects. > As a third party software developer, just about the only container/OU I can depend on is the "cn=Users" container. If I need to create a service account, for example to run my SQL Server instance, this is the best location. During installation if I detect a domain, I create the account there. I would need to investigate how to handle the situation where this is renamed. Off hand, the best way I can think of is to use the well-known RID to find the Administrator user (which is more likely to be renamed), then find the parent container of that account. I doubt many developers would go to the trouble. -- Richard Mueller MVP Directory Services Hilltop Lab - http://www.rlmueller.net -- |
|
#18
| |||
| |||
| Re: Default containers in AD
"Richard Mueller [MVP]" <rlmueller-nospam@ameritech.nospam.net> wrote in message news:edFqUfFbKHA.3768@TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl... > > "FthrJACK" <FthrJACK.423vfa@DoNotSpam.com> wrote in message > news:FthrJACK.423vfa@DoNotSpam.com... >> >> According to Technet its fine doing this, they just dont explain how: >> http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/l...55(WS.10).aspx >> >> >> However, i would only recomend doing it on a new domain setup, incase >> you have scripts and such that explicitly point at objects. >> > > As a third party software developer, just about the only container/OU I > can depend on is the "cn=Users" container. If I need to create a service > account, for example to run my SQL Server instance, this is the best > location. During installation if I detect a domain, I create the account > there. I would need to investigate how to handle the situation where this > is renamed. Off hand, the best way I can think of is to use the well-known > RID to find the Administrator user (which is more likely to be renamed), > then find the parent container of that account. I doubt many developers > would go to the trouble. > > -- > Richard Mueller > MVP Directory Services > Hilltop Lab - http://www.rlmueller.net > -- > > Or worse, if the default Administrator account was moved to an OU somewhere else in the structure. Ace |
![]() |
|
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| |
Similar Threads for: "Default containers in AD" | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Linux Containers Tools | Barsha | Operating Systems | 5 | 01-04-2010 07:32 AM |
| What are the queue containers of the C++ | Catcher | Software Development | 4 | 27-02-2010 07:40 PM |
| Using Top-Level Containers in Java | taher | Software Development | 4 | 10-02-2010 06:49 AM |
| Don't know about Sequence Containers | Sonam Goenka | Software Development | 5 | 09-02-2010 02:10 PM |
| Why 2 different containers for groups | aconti | Active Directory | 2 | 14-10-2009 09:32 PM |